Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-48332

SSRF in Adobe Coldfusion 2023 … 2025

Published
14 July 2026
Modified
15 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.11 95th percentile
Risk Priority 60 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-48332 is a high-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Adobe Coldfusion. Its CVSS base score is 7.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 5% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

ColdFusion is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not…

more

require user interaction. Scope is changed.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Why these techniques?

SSRF vulnerability in public-facing ColdFusion server directly enables exploitation of the application (T1190) for unauthorized internal read access and security bypass.

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-48285Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2025-54234Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2025-49545Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2025-30284Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2025-30290Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2023-38206Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2016-4264Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2024-45113Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2024-34113Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2023-26360Same product: Adobe Coldfusion

Affected Assets

adobe
coldfusion
2023, 2025

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V5.3.2
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces information flow policies to block unauthorized server-initiated requests that enable the SSRF bypass in CVE-2026-48332.

prevent

Requires validation of all inputs to reject crafted URLs or parameters that trigger the SSRF read-access exploitation.

prevent

Implements boundary controls that can restrict or monitor outbound connections initiated by the ColdFusion server to internal resources.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.

References