Security Resilience

CVE-2026-50195

Linuxfoundation Containerd 2.1.0 – 2.1.9

Published
01 July 2026
Modified
02 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0030 22th percentile
Risk Priority 33 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-50195 is a medium-severity Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity (CWE-345) vulnerability in Linuxfoundation Containerd. Its CVSS base score is 5.6 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Software Extensions (T1176); ranked at the 22th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-23 (Session Authenticity) and SI-7 (Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

No EU or UK CSIRT advisories indexed for this CVE.

Vulnerability Data

containerd is an open-source container runtime. Versions prior to 2.3.2, 2.2.5 and 2.1.9 contain a vulnerability in the CRI checkpoint import process where it fails to validate the image references specified within a checkpoint image's configuration. An attacker with permissions…

more

to create pods can use a crafted checkpoint image to force containerd to pull a malicious image and assign it an arbitrary local tag, thereby poisoning the node's local image cache. Subsequently, if other pods on the same node attempt to use the poisoned tag with an IfNotPresent (or Never) pull policy, they will unknowingly execute the attacker's malicious image instead of the legitimate one. This can lead to a compromise of the affected pods, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code under the victim pod's identity. This issue has been fixed in versions 2.3.2, 2.2.5 and 2.1.9.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1176 Software Extensions Persistence
Adversaries may abuse software extensions to establish persistent access to victim systems.
T1195.001 Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate software dependencies and development tools prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
T1003.005 Cached Domain Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access cached domain credentials used to allow authentication to occur in the event a domain controller is unavailable.
T1003.006 DCSync Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credentials and other sensitive information by abusing a Windows Domain Controller's application programming interface (API)(Citation: Microsoft DRSR Dec 2017) (Citation: Microsoft GetNCCChanges) (Citati…
T1007 System Service Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may try to gather information about registered local system services.
T1016.001 Internet Connection Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may check for Internet connectivity on compromised systems.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-53489Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd
CVE-2024-25621Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd
CVE-2025-64329Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd
CVE-2025-47290Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd
CVE-2023-25153Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd
CVE-2025-47291Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd
CVE-2026-53488Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd
CVE-2026-47262Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd
CVE-2026-46680Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd
CVE-2026-53492Same product: Linuxfoundation Containerd

Affected Assets

linuxfoundation
containerd
2.1.0 — 2.1.9 · 2.2.0 — 2.2.5 · 2.3.0 — 2.3.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 6 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V14.2.3
  • V3.5.6
  • V9.1.3
  • V15.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Explicit requirement to protect session authenticity structurally prevents the weakness for communications.

Integrity verification tools detect (but do not stop) the acceptance of data lacking authenticity.

Requires documented, valid provenance for components, preventing acceptance of code from outside the trusted sphere.

Cryptographic mechanisms can be used to verify authenticity, thereby preventing acceptance of invalid data.

Associating security attributes with exchanged information supports verification of authenticity.

Integrity protection on transmitted data directly stops acceptance of unauthenticated or altered data.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

GV.SC-01 partial match
blocks

Supply-chain program directly governs inclusion of third-party executable code.

GV.SC-05 partial match
blocks

Contractual requirements can mandate trusted sources and integrity checks for included functionality.

GV.SC-07 partial match
blocks

Supplier risk assessment explicitly covers risks from their products and libraries.

ID.AM-02 partial match
blocks

Software inventory enables tracking of externally sourced components but does not itself enforce trust.

ID.RA-09 partial match
blocks

Pre-acquisition integrity/authenticity checks directly prevent inclusion of untrusted code.

ID.RA-10 partial match
blocks

Critical-supplier assessment reduces risk of importing executable functionality from untrusted parties.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

removes
removes
removes
removes
blocks

A.5.21's requirements to define/propagate security needs, obtain component origin/trust assurances, validate delivered products (incl. via testing), ensure genuine/unaltered components, and manage lifecycle directly stop most untrusted inclusion by shrinking the untrusted sphere before integration; bounded remainder exists for custom or insider-introduced functionality the clause does not reach.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248635 Executable search paths within the initialization files of all local interactive OL 8 users must only contain paths that resolve to the system default or the user's home directory. blocks CWE-829
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
  • V-271847 OL 9 must be configured so that executable search paths within the initialization files of all local interactive users must only contain paths that resolve to the system default or the users home directory. blocks CWE-829
RHEL 7 (1 rule)
  • V-204477 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must be configured so that all local interactive user initialization files executable search paths contain only paths that resolve to the users home directory. blocks CWE-829
RHEL 8 (1 rule)
  • V-230317 Executable search paths within the initialization files of all local interactive RHEL 8 users must only contain paths that resolve to the system default or the users home directory. blocks CWE-829
RHEL 9 (1 rule)
  • V-258050 Executable search paths within the initialization files of all local interactive RHEL 9 users must only contain paths that resolve to the system default or the users home directory. blocks CWE-829
Windows 10 (1 rule)
  • V-220737 Administrative accounts must not be used with applications that access the Internet, such as web browsers, or with potential Internet sources, such as email. blocks CWE-829

References