Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-67611

Open-Emr Openemr ≤ 8.2.0

Public PoC
Published
03 August 2026
Modified
01 September 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0053 43th percentile
Risk Priority 39 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-67611 is a high-severity Use of Single-factor Authentication (CWE-308) vulnerability in Open-Emr Openemr. Its CVSS base score is 8.6 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Password Spraying (T1110.003); ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-2 (Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)) and IA-8 (Identification and Authentication (Non-organizational Users)) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

OpenEMR through 8.2.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows attackers with valid credentials to circumvent multi-factor authentication by exploiting the exposed OAuth2 password grant flow through an unauthenticated client registration endpoint. Attackers can register an OAuth2 client via the…

more

unauthenticated registration endpoint and use the password grant to exchange credentials for an API access token, bypassing the normal web interface authentication and any enforced multi-factor authentication controls.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1110.003 Password Spraying Credential Access
Adversaries may use a single or small list of commonly used passwords against many different accounts to attempt to acquire valid account credentials.
T1021 Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may use [Valid Accounts](https://attack.
T1078 Valid Accounts Stealth
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion.
T1078.001 Default Accounts Stealth
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of a default account as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion.
T1110.001 Password Guessing Credential Access
Adversaries with no prior knowledge of legitimate credentials within the system or environment may guess passwords to attempt access to accounts.
T1110.002 Password Cracking Credential Access
Adversaries may use password cracking to attempt to recover usable credentials, such as plaintext passwords, when credential material such as password hashes are obtained.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-54347Same product: Open-Emr Openemr
CVE-2026-24898Same product: Open-Emr Openemr
CVE-2025-67645Same product: Open-Emr Openemr
CVE-2023-2944Same product: Open-Emr Openemr
CVE-2023-2946Same product: Open-Emr Openemr
CVE-2023-2674Same product: Open-Emr Openemr
CVE-2026-24896Same product: Open-Emr Openemr
CVE-2025-67752Same product: Open-Emr Openemr
CVE-2026-33931Same product: Open-Emr Openemr
CVE-2026-25127Same product: Open-Emr Openemr

Affected Assets

open-emr
openemr
≤ 8.2.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V6.3.4
  • V6.3.6
  • V6.4.2
  • V6.4.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

ia-2 requires unique identification and authentication of users, directly stopping single-factor schemes by mandating appropriate (multi-factor) mechanisms.

ia-8 requires unique identification and authentication of non-organizational users, directly stopping single-factor schemes by mandating appropriate (multi-factor) mechanisms.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-03 partial match
prevents

Explicit MFA requirement directly eliminates single-factor authentication while the control also addresses broader authentication scope.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Access control policy can mandate multi-factor authentication but does not prescribe the technical implementation.

degrades

Authentication information control directly addresses the need for strong, multi-factor credentials.

degrades

Access rights provisioning can require MFA, yet the control is broader than authentication strength.

degrades

Privileged access rights can be conditioned on MFA, but the control focuses on privilege scope rather than factor count.

degrades

Information access restriction can enforce MFA, yet the control is wider than authentication mechanisms.

prevents

Secure authentication control explicitly requires multi-factor authentication, directly eliminating single-factor weakness.

References