CVE-2026-87913
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-87913 is a medium-severity Unverified Ownership (CWE-283) vulnerability in Amazon (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 5.1 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data Obfuscation (T1001); ranked at the 37th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as AI Agent Protocols and Integrations; in the Protocol-Specific Risks risk domain.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-16 (Security and Privacy Attributes) and AC-24 (Access Control Decisions) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-75571
Vulnerability Data
A missing S3 bucket ownership verification in the AWS Security Agent MCP server before 0.2.0 version might allow remote attackers to obtain the private source archive of a scanned workspace, including credentials and infrastructure state contained in that archive, via…
more
a pre-registered storage bucket whose name is derived from a publicly known account identifier. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.2.0. Users should also verify that the scan output bucket in their account is owned by their own account, because upgrading does not release a bucket name that a third party has already registered.
- CWE(s)
AI Security AnalysisAI
- AI Category
- AI Agent Protocols and Integrations
- Risk Domain
- Protocol-Specific Risks
- OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
- None mapped
- Classification Reason
- Matched keywords: mcp
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 3 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
V6.6.1V6.5.3V6.5.8
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Associating ownership as a security attribute enables subsequent verification of resource ownership.
Requiring access decisions to consider all relevant attributes includes ownership verification.
A reference monitor provides the tamperproof mechanism that can enforce ownership checks.
Access enforcement directly requires verifying ownership before granting access to resources.
Authenticator management requires generation and distribution of values that cannot be derived from observable state.
Cryptographic key establishment mandates use of unpredictable, non-observable values for keys and nonces.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Enforcing defined access permissions and authorizations directly prevents missing ownership verification for resources.
Hardened configuration baselines can enforce use of cryptographically secure RNG sources and disable predictable state-based mechanisms.
Secure SDLC practices directly require cryptographically secure random values instead of observable state such as time or PID.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Access control policies can require ownership verification before granting access to critical resources.
Identity management processes can include verification of resource ownership during provisioning and access decisions.
A.5.18 governs the provisioning, review, and revocation of access rights based on authorization and policy; it does not verify resource ownership and cannot stop exploitation of unverified ownership.
A.8.2 controls the allocation, review, expiry and use of privileged rights via authorization and least-privilege rules; it has no bearing on whether a resource's ownership is verified before use, so the CWE-283 weakness can still be present and exploited.
Cryptographic controls replace predictable values with high-entropy, non-guessable material.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Windows Server 2016 (1 rule)
- V-224831 Local volumes must use a format that supports NTFS attributes. blocks CWE-283
Windows Server 2019 (1 rule)
- V-205663 Windows Server 2019 local volumes must use a format that supports NTFS attributes. blocks CWE-283