CVE-2026-90711

A reference monitor must be small and correct, structurally limiting the chance of flawed comparison logic in authorization decisions.

Information flow enforcement can require that data or decisions are taken only from explicitly approved, higher-trust sources rather than less-verified ones.

Proper unique identification and authentication of users directly stops spoofing-based bypass of authentication.

Device identification and authentication before connection prevents spoofing of devices to bypass auth.

Authenticator management ensures credentials cannot be easily spoofed or reused to bypass authentication.

Authentication of non-organizational users blocks external spoofing attempts against the scheme.

Correlating multiple sources can surface discrepancies that discourage reliance on the less-trusted one.

Explicit authenticity/integrity checks before use directly reduce selection of a less-trusted source.

Proofing and binding identities reduces spoofing opportunities during enrollment but does not address runtime authentication implementation flaws.

Requiring authentication of users/services/hardware directly counters spoofing-based bypass when strong methods are used.

Protecting, conveying, and verifying identity assertions specifically prevents the spoofing that enables authentication bypass.

Protecting data-in-transit integrity helps ensure the more-trusted source is the one whose data is accepted.

Access control policy reduces spoofing opportunities but does not prescribe authentication mechanisms.

Identity management supports unique identities but does not guarantee resistance to spoofing.

Authentication information management directly addresses credential handling that prevents spoofing.

Access rights assignment limits exposure but does not enforce authentication strength.

Privileged access rights reduce attack surface but do not prevent spoofing of authentication.

Network security can limit spoofing vectors but does not address application-level authentication.