Security Resilience

CWE · MITRE source

CWE-664Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime

Abstraction: Pillar · CVEs in our corpus: 58

The product does not maintain or incorrectly maintains control over a resource throughout its lifetime of creation, use, and release.

Resources often have explicit instructions on how to be created, used and destroyed. When code does not follow these instructions, it can lead to unexpected behaviors and potentially exploitable states. Even without explicit instructions, various principles are expected to be adhered to, such as "Do not use an object until after its creation is complete," or "do not use an object after it has been slated for destruction."

Last updated: 15 October 2026 14:21 UTC

Cumulative inbound coverage

How completely the frameworks we cross-walk collectively cover this — the verdict is the strongest single mapping (overlapping partials are not summed); breadth shows the corroboration behind it.

Collective: mostly · 3 mapping(s) from 2 framework(s): STIG windows server 2016 2 (mostly) · STIG windows server 2019 1 (partial)

See the full cumulative-coverage rollup →

Control responseHuman-reviewed

Answering this weakness across the control lifecycle, from our framework cross-walks.

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53 / CSF Protect)
  • SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools
  • SA-24 Design For Cyber Resiliency
  • SI-14 Non-persistence
Detect
Catch it (CSF Detect / Respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

NIST 800-53 r5 controls PROPOSED for this weakness (3)AI-assisted

These are model PROPOSALS, not graded mappings. They come from controls_to_cwe_proposals, which carries no grade field at all; across the CWE pages 1,540 of 1,722 such associations (89%) have never been graded by anything. The heading said “address” until 2026-09-29, which asserted a relationship the data does not carry. Graded cross-walks are on the framework map, not here.

Control Title Family Why it addresses this CWE
SA-15Development Process, Standards, and ToolsSARequires a managed development lifecycle process with integrity controls on changes, improving control of resources throughout their lifetime.
SA-24Design For Cyber ResiliencySARequires designing resource lifetime controls that anticipate, withstand, and recover from stresses or attacks, mitigating improper resource control.
SI-14Non-persistenceSIDirectly enforces limited resource lifetime by requiring initiation from a known state and explicit termination, shrinking the window any long-lived resource weakness can be exploited.

Top CVEs of this weakness type, ranked by Risk Priority

CVE Risk CVSS EPSS Published
CVE-2022-27518 KEV 9.99.80.06862022-12-13
CVE-2026-20274 7.49.80.00732026-09-02
CVE-2026-203537.39.80.00402026-09-14
CVE-2026-765007.29.80.00322026-10-07
CVE-2019-5816 6.98.80.01652019-06-27
CVE-2020-3175 6.68.60.01972020-02-26
CVE-2026-8517 6.68.80.00532026-05-14
CVE-2026-43503 6.68.80.01992026-05-23
CVE-2022-20856 6.58.60.01282022-09-30
CVE-2026-762826.58.80.00312026-10-07
CVE-2026-203366.48.80.00202026-09-16
CVE-2022-2048 6.37.50.02562022-07-07
CVE-2022-2191 6.27.50.02182022-07-07
CVE-2026-20269 6.28.60.00472026-08-05
CVE-2016-8763 6.07.80.00752017-04-02
CVE-2023-44288 6.07.50.00702023-12-05
CVE-2022-32846 5.97.50.00622023-02-27
CVE-2024-41169 5.97.50.00692025-07-12
CVE-2026-20158 5.97.50.00472026-07-15
CVE-2026-18549 5.97.50.00602026-08-15
CVE-2026-1020265.97.50.00462026-10-14
CVE-2023-52387 5.87.50.00342024-02-18
CVE-2026-764675.77.50.00252026-10-07
CVE-2022-31153 5.46.50.01462022-07-15
CVE-2024-7889 5.47.30.00252024-09-11