CVE-2011-1823
Memory Safety in Google Android 2.0 – 2.3.4
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2011-1823 is a high-severity Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190) vulnerability in Google Android. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
The vulnerability is an integer overflow (CWE-190) in the vold volume manager daemon on Android 3.0 and 2.x releases prior to 2.3.4. It arises because vold trusts all messages received over a PF_NETLINK socket and performs a maximum-only bounds check on a signed integer index inside DirectVolume::handlePartitionAdded; a negative value bypasses the check and produces memory corruption.
Local users on an affected device can exploit the flaw by sending a crafted netlink message, achieving arbitrary code execution and root privileges. Publicly demonstrated proof-of-concept code such as Gingerbreak implements this attack vector.
Upstream fixes appear in the referenced Android platform commits to system/vold, system/core, and system/netd; these changes add proper validation of netlink message contents and index values. Devices must be updated to Android 2.3.4 or later, or receive the corresponding vendor patches, to close the issue.
The vulnerability saw immediate real-world exploitation through publicly released rooting tools shortly after disclosure.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2011-1821
Vulnerability Data
The vold volume manager daemon on Android 3.0 and 2.x before 2.3.4 trusts messages that are received from a PF_NETLINK socket, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code and gain root privileges via a negative index that bypasses a…
more
maximum-only signed integer check in the DirectVolume::handlePartitionAdded method, which triggers memory corruption, as demonstrated by Gingerbreak.
- CWE(s)
- KEV Date Added
- 08 September 2022
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.6
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require use of safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and testing that prevent integer overflows.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect integer overflows before release.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and arithmetic checks that prevent integer overflows.
Application security requirements include bounds checking and safe arithmetic to avoid overflow conditions.
Secure architecture principles require defensive coding patterns that mitigate integer wraparound risks.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe integer operations and mandate overflow-safe constructs.