Security Resilience

CVE-2012-2034

Memory Safety in Adobe Flash Player ≤ 11.2.202.235

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedMemory Safety
Published
09 June 2012
Modified
21 April 2026
KEV Added
28 March 2022
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.077 95th percentile
Risk Priority 82 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2012-2034 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 5% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Adobe Flash Player versions prior to 10.3.183.20 and 11.x prior to 11.3.300.257 on Windows and Mac OS X, prior to 10.3.183.20 and 11.x prior to 11.2.202.236 on Linux, prior to 11.1.111.10 on Android 2.x and 3.x, and prior to 11.1.115.9 on Android 4.x, along with Adobe AIR before 3.3.0.3610, contain a memory corruption flaw tracked as CWE-119. The issue permits arbitrary code execution or denial of service through unspecified vectors and is distinct from CVE-2012-2037. It carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflecting network attack complexity and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can deliver malicious Flash content via a web browser or AIR application to trigger the flaw. Successful exploitation grants the ability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the affected process or to crash the Flash runtime, potentially leading to system compromise on the target platform.

Adobe security bulletin APSB12-14 and corresponding vendor advisories from Red Hat and openSUSE direct users to apply the updated Flash Player and AIR releases that remediate the vulnerability. Organizations should prioritize installation of these patches across all supported operating systems to eliminate exposure.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Adobe Flash Player before 10.3.183.20 and 11.x before 11.3.300.257 on Windows and Mac OS X; before 10.3.183.20 and 11.x before 11.2.202.236 on Linux; before 11.1.111.10 on Android 2.x and 3.x; and before 11.1.115.9 on Android 4.x, and Adobe AIR before…

more

3.3.0.3610, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-2037.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
28 March 2022

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2014-0502Same product: Adobe Flash Playerboth on KEV
CVE-2014-0497Same product: Adobe Flash Playerboth on KEV
CVE-2013-0648Same product: Adobe Flash Playerboth on KEV
CVE-2013-0643Same product: Adobe Flash Playerboth on KEV
CVE-2016-4171Same product: Adobe Flash Playerboth on KEV
CVE-2015-5119Same product: Adobe Flash Playerboth on KEV
CVE-2012-1535Same product: Adobe Flash Playerboth on KEV
CVE-2013-0641Same product: Linux Linux Kernelboth on KEV
CVE-2013-0640Same product: Linux Linux Kernelboth on KEV
CVE-2015-7645Same product: Adobe Flash Playerboth on KEV

Affected Assets

adobe
flash player
≤ 11.2.202.235 · ≤ 11.1.115.8 · ≤ 11.1.111.9
adobe
air
≤ 3.2.0.2070
opensuse
opensuse
11.4, 12.1
suse
linux enterprise desktop
10, 11
redhat
enterprise linux desktop
5.0, 6.0
redhat
enterprise linux eus
6.2
redhat
enterprise linux server
5.0, 6.0
redhat
enterprise linux server aus
6.2
redhat
enterprise linux workstation
5.0, 6.0

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-119

Ongoing control assessments and code testing (static/dynamic analysis, fuzzing) surface memory buffer restriction failures, which are then remediated before release.

addresses: CWE-119

Managed runtimes used by platform-independent applications (e.g., JVM, CLR) enforce memory safety, preventing most buffer overflows that require direct memory manipulation.

addresses: CWE-119

Memory protections (e.g., W^X, ASLR) make exploitation of buffer-boundary violations far harder to turn into code execution.

addresses: CWE-119

Detects exploitation attempts that produce memory corruption, crashes, or anomalous behavior.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices (secure coding guidelines, security requirements, testing including code scans and penetration tests, developer training) that reach buffer management and can stop many buffer overruns from reaching production, but leaves a bounded remainder (e.g. flaws in non-software components, incomplete enforcement of guidelines, or post-deployment changes)

blocks

Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (e.g. least privilege, fail securely, distrust external input, hardening) plus design reviews that can catch and stop buffer-boundary errors before they reach code, but this is only one minority slice of CWE-119's broad surface (language-specific flaws, unsafe library use, compiler/runtime mitigations, and post-deployment instances remain outside its direct scope).

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer operations, directly eliminating CWE-119.

finds

Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-119, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-823.

References