Cyber Resilience

CVE-2021-4034

Memory Safety in Redhat Enterprise Linux Server Aus 7.3 … 8.4

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedPublic PoCMemory Safety
Published
28 January 2022
Modified
06 November 2025
KEV Added
27 June 2022
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.95 99.9th percentile
Risk Priority 83 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2021-4034 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Redhat Enterprise Linux Server Aus. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 0.1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

A local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in polkit's pkexec utility, a setuid tool that permits unprivileged users to execute commands as privileged users according to predefined policies. The flaw stems from incorrect handling of the argument count passed to pkexec, which causes the program to attempt execution of environment variables as commands. This issue is tracked as CVE-2021-4034 with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 and is associated with CWE-787 and CWE-125.

An attacker with local access and a low-privileged account can supply specially crafted environment variables to induce pkexec to run arbitrary code, resulting in full administrative rights on the affected system.

Public references include Red Hat's RHSB-2022-001 bulletin and associated Bugzilla entry, a Siemens security advisory, and multiple exploit postings on Packetstorm Security.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A local privilege escalation vulnerability was found on polkit's pkexec utility. The pkexec application is a setuid tool designed to allow unprivileged users to run commands as privileged users according predefined policies. The current version of pkexec doesn't handle the…

more

calling parameters count correctly and ends trying to execute environment variables as commands. An attacker can leverage this by crafting environment variables in such a way it'll induce pkexec to execute arbitrary code. When successfully executed the attack can cause a local privilege escalation given unprivileged users administrative rights on the target machine.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
27 June 2022

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1211 Exploitation for Stealth Stealth
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities to evade detection by hiding activity, suppressing logging, or operating within trusted or unmonitored components.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2019-11043Same product: Canonical Ubuntu Linuxboth on KEV
CVE-2019-5544Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktopboth on KEV
CVE-2013-0640Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktopboth on KEV
CVE-2021-44142Same product: Canonical Ubuntu Linux
CVE-2024-0519Shared CWE-125, CWE-787both on KEV
CVE-2025-5419Shared CWE-125, CWE-787both on KEV
CVE-2023-4911Same product: Canonical Ubuntu Linuxboth on KEV
CVE-2015-3043Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktopboth on KEV
CVE-2018-17480Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktopboth on KEV
CVE-2015-3113Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktopboth on KEV

Affected Assets

polkit project
polkit
≤ 121
redhat
enterprise linux server update services for sap solutions
7.6, 7.7, 8.1, 8.2, 8.4
redhat
enterprise linux
8.0
redhat
enterprise linux desktop
7.0
redhat
enterprise linux eus
8.2
redhat
enterprise linux for ibm z systems
7.0, 8.0
redhat
enterprise linux for ibm z systems eus
8.2, 8.4
redhat
enterprise linux for power big endian
7.0
redhat
enterprise linux for power little endian
7.0, 8.0
redhat
enterprise linux for power little endian eus
8.1, 8.2, 8.4
+20 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-787

Out-of-bounds writes that corrupt control flow or inject shellcode are rendered non-executable by the same memory protections.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging can record evidence of an out-of-bounds read but does not prevent the weakness itself.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates practices that prevent out-of-bounds writes.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.

prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles reduce the likelihood of buffer overflows.

prevents

Secure coding directly addresses out-of-bounds writes through language choice and coding standards.

References