Security Resilience

CVE-2021-44228

RCE in Cisco Webex Meetings Server ≤ 3.0

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedPublic PoCRansomware-linkedRCEDeserializationDoS
Published
10 December 2021
Modified
11 August 2026
KEV Added
10 December 2021
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 10.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.99 100.0th percentile
Risk Priority 100 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2021-44228 is a critical-severity Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) vulnerability in Cisco Webex Meetings Server. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data Obfuscation (T1001); ranked in the top 0.0% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0, excluding the security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1, are affected by a flaw in JNDI features used within configuration, log messages, and parameters. These features do not protect against attacker-controlled LDAP and other JNDI endpoints, enabling arbitrary code execution when message lookup substitution is enabled. The issue is specific to log4j-core and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 10.0.

An attacker able to control log messages or log message parameters can trigger the vulnerability to load and execute arbitrary code from remote LDAP servers. No privileges or user interaction are required, and the attack can be performed over the network with impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The provided references include multiple public proofs of concept for remote code execution and information disclosure against affected versions, along with vendor advisories. The underlying description states that the behavior was disabled by default starting in 2.15.0 and the functionality was fully removed in 2.16.0 and the listed security releases.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages…

more

or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
10 December 2021

Related Threats

Threat-Actor AttributionAI

Amazon.com (Walmart logistics engineer recruitment civil claims)
Mitigating Log4Shell and Other Log4j-Related Vulnerabilities | CISA
Microsoft Corp. (Salesforce / Slack engineer recruitment claims)
Mitigating Log4Shell and Other Log4j-Related Vulnerabilities | CISA
AnonOps
Mitigating Log4Shell and Other Log4j-Related Vulnerabilities | CISA
0day
Mitigating Log4Shell and Other Log4j-Related Vulnerabilities | CISA
Karakurt
Karakurt Data Extortion Group | CISA
Deep Panda (G0009)
Malicious Cyber Actors Continue to Exploit Log4Shell in VMware Horizon Systems | CISA
HAFNIUM (G0125)
Top CVEs Actively Exploited By People’s Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actors | CISA
HiddenTear
#StopRansomware: Ransomware Attacks on Critical Infrastructure Fund DPRK Malicious Cyber Activities | CISA
Storm-0530
#StopRansomware: Ransomware Attacks on Critical Infrastructure Fund DPRK Malicious Cyber Activities | CISA
Evil Ransomware
#StopRansomware: Ransomware Attacks on Critical Infrastructure Fund DPRK Malicious Cyber Activities | CISA
Maui ransomware
#StopRansomware: Ransomware Attacks on Critical Infrastructure Fund DPRK Malicious Cyber Activities | CISA
red ransomware
#StopRansomware: Ransomware Attacks on Critical Infrastructure Fund DPRK Malicious Cyber Activities | CISA
eCh0raix
#StopRansomware: Ransomware Attacks on Critical Infrastructure Fund DPRK Malicious Cyber Activities | CISA
Apple Inc. (Masimo pulse-oximetry trade-secret 2020-2024)
Understanding Ransomware Threat Actors: LockBit | CISA
LockBit
Understanding Ransomware Threat Actors: LockBit | CISA
SK Innovation (LG Chem 2019-2021 ITC defendant)
Multiple Nation-State Threat Actors Exploit CVE-2022-47966 and CVE-2022-42475 | CISA
Daixin Team
Multiple Nation-State Threat Actors Exploit CVE-2022-47966 and CVE-2022-42475 | CISA
Intel Corp. (Micron 2018-2020 NAND civil counter-claims)
People’s Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of State Security APT40 Tradecraft in Action | CISA
Leviathan (G0065)
People’s Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of State Security APT40 Tradecraft in Action | CISA
Google LLC (civil insider-recruitment defendant)
North Korea Cyber Group Conducts Global Espionage Campaign to Advance Regime’s Military and Nuclear Programs | CISA
North Korea Cyber Group Conducts Global Espionage Campaign to Advance Regime’s Military and Nuclear Programs | CISA
Clop
2023 Top Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities | CISA
l group
North Korea Cyber Group Conducts Global Espionage Campaign to Advance Regime’s Military and Nuclear Programs | CISA

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001 Data Obfuscation Command And Control
Adversaries may obfuscate command and control traffic to make it more difficult to detect.
T1001.001 Junk Data Command And Control
Adversaries may add junk data to protocols used for command and control to make detection more difficult.
T1001.003 Protocol or Service Impersonation Command And Control
Adversaries may impersonate legitimate protocols or web service traffic to disguise command and control activity and thwart analysis efforts.
T1003 OS Credential Dumping Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to dump credentials to obtain account login and credential material, normally in the form of a hash or a clear text password.
T1003.001 LSASS Memory Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credential material stored in the process memory of the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS).
T1003.005 Cached Domain Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access cached domain credentials used to allow authentication to occur in the event a domain controller is unavailable.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-46604Same product: Debian Debian Linuxboth on KEV
CVE-2017-9805Same product class: NAS / storage applianceboth on KEV
CVE-2010-1871Same product: Netapp Oncommand Insightboth on KEV
CVE-2021-39144Same product: Debian Debian Linuxboth on KEV
CVE-2021-45046Same product: Apache Log4Jboth on KEV
CVE-2018-19949Same product class: NAS / storage applianceboth on KEV
CVE-2019-7193Same product class: NAS / storage applianceboth on KEV
CVE-2019-17571Same product: Apache Log4J
CVE-2019-0192Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2021-21344Same product: Debian Debian Linux

Affected Assets

siemens
6bk1602-0aa12-0tp0 firmware
≤ 2.7.0
siemens
6bk1602-0aa22-0tp0 firmware
≤ 2.7.0
siemens
6bk1602-0aa32-0tp0 firmware
≤ 2.7.0
siemens
6bk1602-0aa42-0tp0 firmware
≤ 2.7.0
siemens
6bk1602-0aa52-0tp0 firmware
≤ 2.7.0
apache
log4j
2.0 · 2.0.1 — 2.3.1 · 2.4.0 — 2.12.2 · 2.13.0 — 2.15.0
siemens
sppa-t3000 ses3000 firmware
all versions
siemens
capital
2019.1 · ≤ 2019.1
siemens
comos
≤ 10.4.2
siemens
desigo cc advanced reports
3.0, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0
+133 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.1.2
  • V1.3.2
  • V1.3.5
  • V4.3.1

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

Security testing and evaluation at multiple SDLC stages directly detects missing or flawed input validation, with the required remediation process ensuring fixes are applied.

addresses: CWE-20 CWE-502

Directly implements checks on information inputs to reject invalid data before processing.

addresses: CWE-20 CWE-400

Spam protection mechanisms perform filtering and detection on inbound/outbound messages, directly compensating for missing or weak input validation of unsolicited content.

addresses: CWE-400

Limiting concurrent sessions directly prevents uncontrolled resource consumption by capping the number of active sessions per user or account.

addresses: CWE-400

Analysis identifies uncontrolled resource consumption indicative of denial-of-service or abuse attempts.

addresses: CWE-502

Penetration testing supplies malicious serialized objects, detecting unsafe deserialization and supporting corrective actions.

addresses: CWE-400

Contingency plan testing includes resource exhaustion scenarios to verify recovery, making it harder for attackers to sustain exploits that cause uncontrolled consumption.

addresses: CWE-400

Updated contingency plans include current procedures to detect, contain, and recover from resource exhaustion, limiting an attacker's ability to sustain impact from uncontrolled consumption.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization and safe EL construction to prevent injection flaws.

PR.PS-02 none match
blocks

PR.PS-02 addresses only post-deployment updates/patching and cannot prevent introduction of unsafe deserialization code, yet it can remediate some instances when the flaw exists in outdated libraries or components.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

removes
removes
removes
removes
finds

Pre-agreed severity-based prioritization and resource allocation during incident triage reduce the likelihood that an attacker-induced resource exhaustion will overwhelm the organization before corrective action is taken.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-20, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.
  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-400, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-770.

References