CVE-2022-37055
Memory Safety in Dlink Go-Rt-Ac750 Firmware 1.01b03 … 2.00b02
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2022-37055 is a critical-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Dlink Go-Rt-Ac750 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
D-Link Go-RT-AC750 routers running firmware GORTAC750_revA_v101b03 and GO-RT-AC750_revB_FWv200b02 contain a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-120) reachable through the cgibin hnap_main component. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 and permits unauthenticated network access that can result in full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
An attacker with network adjacency to an affected device can send crafted requests to the HNAP endpoint without credentials or user interaction, enabling arbitrary code execution or device takeover. The published EPSS score of 0.8048 (peak 0.8291) indicates sustained exploitation interest since disclosure.
D-Link has issued security publication SAP10308 and corresponding bulletins at supportannouncement.us.dlink.com and www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin/ that address the affected firmware versions.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2022-39709
Vulnerability Data
D-Link Go-RT-AC750 GORTAC750_revA_v101b03 and GO-RT-AC750_revB_FWv200b02 are vulnerable to Buffer Overflow via cgibin, hnap_main,
- CWE(s)
- KEV Date Added
- 08 December 2025
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Platform-independent managed code eliminates the need for unchecked native buffer copies that are the root cause of classic buffer overflows.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.
Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.
Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.
Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.