CVE-2023-0646
Command Injection in Dst-Admin Project Dst-Admin 1.5.0
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:LSummary
CVE-2023-0646 is a medium-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Dst-Admin Project Dst-Admin. Its CVSS base score is 6.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 13% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2023-0646 is a command injection vulnerability in dst-admin 1.5.0 that resides in the /home/cavesConsole endpoint. The flaw arises from unsanitized handling of the command argument and is tracked as CWE-77 with a CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3.
An authenticated remote attacker can supply a malicious command value to the affected interface and achieve arbitrary command execution on the underlying system. Public exploit code for this issue has been released.
The associated EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0626 with no material rise after disclosure. Available references consist of a GitHub repository containing reproduction details and multiple Vuldb entries, but contain no information on official patches or mitigation steps.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-12680
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in dst-admin 1.5.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /home/cavesConsole. The manipulation of the argument command leads to command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit…
more
has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-220033 was assigned to this vulnerability.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8V1.2.9
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.
Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.