Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:NCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2023-1317 is a medium-severity Cross-site Scripting (CWE-79) vulnerability in Enhancesoft Osticket. Its CVSS base score is 5.4 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Protocol or Service Impersonation (T1001.003); ranked in the top 37% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2023-1317 is a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability (CWE-79) affecting the osTicket open-source ticketing system in the osticket/osticket GitHub repository prior to version 1.16.6. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.4 and stems from insufficient input sanitization that allows attacker-controlled data to be reflected in responses.
An authenticated user with low privileges can supply a crafted request that, when a victim with a higher-privileged session interacts with a malicious link, executes arbitrary script in the context of the osTicket application. Successful exploitation yields limited read and write access to application data within a changed security scope but does not directly impact availability.
The referenced GitHub commit daee20fdd8ac926d9aee700b201ac2cb35d448ca and the associated huntr.dev report document the fix that was merged to address the issue; administrators should upgrade to osTicket 1.16.6 or later to obtain the remediation. The EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0647 with no material increase since disclosure.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-23575
Vulnerability Data
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in GitHub repository osticket/osticket prior to v1.16.6.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.1.2V1.3.2
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Penetration testing submits XSS payloads to web applications, detecting cross-site scripting flaws for subsequent remediation.
Validates web inputs to reject script-related content that could produce XSS.
Output validation against expected content can reject or sanitize script content in generated web pages, reducing XSS exploitability.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly target introduction of XSS via coding standards/testing (mostly), yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors unaddressed (partial).
Patching and EOL replacement can remediate known XSS instances in libraries or frameworks (partial) but do nothing to enforce input neutralization in application code (none).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
A.5.6 only promotes membership in groups to improve knowledge, receive alerts, and share information; it performs no action that stops XSS exploitation (or even the underlying neutralization defect) and is a pure dependency for other controls per the owner's labeling rule.