CVE-2023-1636
Redhat Openstack Platform 16.1 … 17.0
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:LCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2023-1636 is a medium-severity Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization (CWE-653) vulnerability in Redhat Openstack Platform. Its CVSS base score is 6.0 (Medium).
Operationally, ranked at the 40th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-2450
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was found in OpenStack Barbican containers. This vulnerability is only applicable to deployments that utilize an all-in-one configuration. Barbican containers share the same CGROUP, USER, and NET namespace with the host system and other OpenStack services. If any…
more
service is compromised, it could gain access to the data transmitted to and from Barbican.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Defines isolation boundaries by specifying which external systems may access or process organization data.
Maintains isolation and compartmentalization by restricting flows between security domains or levels.
Reviewing the continued need for connections supports isolation and compartmentalization.
Locating systems away from hazards improves isolation and compartmentalization from external physical or environmental threats.
The CONOPS must articulate isolation and compartmentalization expectations for security and privacy, making architectural failures in separation of duties or domains harder to overlook.
Security architectures commonly incorporate isolation and compartmentalization strategies to limit the impact of compromises.
Organization-wide privacy program leadership ensures proper isolation and compartmentalization of personal data.
Oversight ensures data-matching activities maintain required isolation between distinct data sets and authorized user communities.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Access control policies establish the boundaries that isolation must enforce.
A.5.18's provisioning, review, SoD enforcement, activation-only-after-authorization, and timely revocation directly stop exploitation of improper isolation/compartmentalization by ensuring privilege boundaries are authorized, segregated, and maintained; bounded remainder is flawed isolation designs that are never granted rights in the first place (pure design flaw, not a rights-management failure).
A.5.3 directly mandates determining and enforcing segregation of conflicting duties/roles (with examples that map to privilege boundaries), which stops improper isolation from being exploitable in most cases; the bounded remainder is small organizations or cases where segregation is impracticable and the clause itself falls back to other controls.
Privileged access rights require strict isolation from ordinary user contexts.
A.8.22's network-domain segregation and perimeter gateways (firewalls) directly enforce isolation between trust/criticality levels, stopping cross-domain exploitation of improper compartmentalization for the bulk of network-based privilege flows; the bounded remainder is non-network resources (e.g. process-level or in-memory compartmentalization inside a single domain).
A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles including least privilege, defense-in-depth, compartmentalization via zero-trust/never-trust, fail-secure, and explicit analysis of control placement and integration to isolate differing privilege levels; this stops exploitation of most improper-isolation cases but leaves a bounded remainder (e.g. certain legacy or safety-overriding exceptions that must be formally acknowledged).
Hardening callouts derived
DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.
- No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-653, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.