Security Resilience

CVE-2023-1636

Redhat Openstack Platform 16.1 … 17.0

Published
24 September 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 6.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0048 40th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-1636 is a medium-severity Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization (CWE-653) vulnerability in Redhat Openstack Platform. Its CVSS base score is 6.0 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 40th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was found in OpenStack Barbican containers. This vulnerability is only applicable to deployments that utilize an all-in-one configuration. Barbican containers share the same CGROUP, USER, and NET namespace with the host system and other OpenStack services. If any…

more

service is compromised, it could gain access to the data transmitted to and from Barbican.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-1633Same product: Openstack Barbican
CVE-2023-1625Same product: Redhat Openstack Platform
CVE-2024-7319Same product: Redhat Openstack Platform
CVE-2026-4325Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2024-8007Same product: Redhat Openstack Platform
CVE-2026-4282Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2023-3637Same product: Redhat Openstack Platform
CVE-2023-6725Same product: Redhat Openstack Platform
CVE-2025-12805Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2023-5625Same product: Redhat Openstack Platform

Affected Assets

openstack
barbican
all versions
redhat
openstack platform
16.1, 16.2, 17.0

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-653

Defines isolation boundaries by specifying which external systems may access or process organization data.

addresses: CWE-653

Maintains isolation and compartmentalization by restricting flows between security domains or levels.

addresses: CWE-653

Reviewing the continued need for connections supports isolation and compartmentalization.

addresses: CWE-653

Locating systems away from hazards improves isolation and compartmentalization from external physical or environmental threats.

addresses: CWE-653

The CONOPS must articulate isolation and compartmentalization expectations for security and privacy, making architectural failures in separation of duties or domains harder to overlook.

addresses: CWE-653

Security architectures commonly incorporate isolation and compartmentalization strategies to limit the impact of compromises.

addresses: CWE-653

Organization-wide privacy program leadership ensures proper isolation and compartmentalization of personal data.

addresses: CWE-653

Oversight ensures data-matching activities maintain required isolation between distinct data sets and authorized user communities.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Access control policies establish the boundaries that isolation must enforce.

blocks

A.5.18's provisioning, review, SoD enforcement, activation-only-after-authorization, and timely revocation directly stop exploitation of improper isolation/compartmentalization by ensuring privilege boundaries are authorized, segregated, and maintained; bounded remainder is flawed isolation designs that are never granted rights in the first place (pure design flaw, not a rights-management failure).

blocks

A.5.3 directly mandates determining and enforcing segregation of conflicting duties/roles (with examples that map to privilege boundaries), which stops improper isolation from being exploitable in most cases; the bounded remainder is small organizations or cases where segregation is impracticable and the clause itself falls back to other controls.

degrades

Privileged access rights require strict isolation from ordinary user contexts.

blocks

A.8.22's network-domain segregation and perimeter gateways (firewalls) directly enforce isolation between trust/criticality levels, stopping cross-domain exploitation of improper compartmentalization for the bulk of network-based privilege flows; the bounded remainder is non-network resources (e.g. process-level or in-memory compartmentalization inside a single domain).

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles including least privilege, defense-in-depth, compartmentalization via zero-trust/never-trust, fail-secure, and explicit analysis of control placement and integration to isolate differing privilege levels; this stops exploitation of most improper-isolation cases but leaves a bounded remainder (e.g. certain legacy or safety-overriding exceptions that must be formally acknowledged).

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-653, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References