Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-28504

Memory Safety in Rocketsoftware Universe ≤ 11.3.5

Published
29 March 2023
Modified
18 February 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.014 70th percentile
Risk Priority 78 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-28504 is a critical-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Rocketsoftware Universe. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 30% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Rocket Software UniData versions prior to 8.2.4 build 3003 and UniVerse versions prior to 11.3.5 build 1001 or 12.2.1 build 2002 contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability tracked as CVE-2023-28504. The flaw, assigned CWE-120 and CWE-787, resides in the UniRPC server component and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, and no required privileges or user interaction.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted network requests to trigger the overflow, resulting in arbitrary code execution with root privileges on the affected server. This grants complete control over the database environment, including the ability to read, modify, or delete data and potentially pivot to other systems.

Public advisories from Rapid7 detail that the vulnerabilities were fixed in the listed builds of UniData and UniVerse and recommend immediate upgrade of the UniRPC server to eliminate the buffer overflow exposure.

The associated EPSS score rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.0514 before receding to the current value of 0.0196, indicating measurable post-disclosure exploitation interest.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Rocket Software UniData versions prior to 8.2.4 build 3003 and UniVerse versions prior to 11.3.5 build 1001 or 12.2.1 build 2002 suffer from a stack-based buffer overflow that can lead to remote code execution as the root user.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1211 Exploitation for Stealth Stealth
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities to evade detection by hiding activity, suppressing logging, or operating within trusted or unmonitored components.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-28506Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-28502Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-28508Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-28505Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-53203Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-5717Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-45863Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-31436Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-0977Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-1078Same product: Linux Linux Kernel

Affected Assets

rocketsoftware
unidata
≤ 8.2.4
rocketsoftware
universe
≤ 11.3.5 · 12.0.0 — 12.2.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.1

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-120

Platform-independent managed code eliminates the need for unchecked native buffer copies that are the root cause of classic buffer overflows.

addresses: CWE-787

Out-of-bounds writes that corrupt control flow or inject shellcode are rendered non-executable by the same memory protections.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.

prevents

Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.

References