CVE-2023-29799
RCE in Totolink X18 Firmware 9.1.0cu.2024_b20220329
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-29799 is a critical-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Totolink X18 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 21% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2023-29799 is a command-injection flaw (CWE-77) in the TOTOLINK X18 wireless router running firmware version V9.1.0cu.2024_B20220329. The vulnerability resides in the setOpModeCfg function, where the hostname parameter is passed to a system command without adequate sanitization, allowing arbitrary command execution.
An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the issue over the network by sending a crafted HTTP request containing shell metacharacters in the hostname field. Successful exploitation grants the attacker full control of the device, enabling actions such as configuration changes, traffic interception, or use of the router as a foothold for further attacks inside the local network. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 reflects the absence of required authentication or user interaction.
The associated EPSS score rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.2264 before settling at the current value of 0.1490, indicating that exploitation interest increased measurably after public disclosure and that the vulnerability merits renewed attention.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-33337
Vulnerability Data
TOTOLINK X18 V9.1.0cu.2024_B20220329 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the hostname parameter in the setOpModeCfg function.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8V1.2.9
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.
Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.