CVE-2023-29801
RCE in Totolink X18 Firmware 9.1.0cu.2024_b20220329
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-29801 is a critical-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Totolink X18 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 21% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
TOTOLINK X18 firmware version V9.1.0cu.2024_B20220329 contains multiple command-injection flaws in the setSyslogCfg function. Unauthenticated attackers can supply crafted values for the rtLogEnabled and rtLogServer parameters to execute arbitrary operating-system commands on the device. The issues are tracked as CVE-2023-29801, carry a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8, and are classified under CWE-77.
Because the vulnerable function is reachable over the network without authentication or user interaction, an attacker who can reach the router’s management interface can obtain full control of the device, including the ability to read or modify configuration, capture traffic, or pivot into attached networks. The same access also permits persistent changes such as the installation of additional malware or the alteration of DNS and logging settings.
Public exploit details have been posted to Notion, yet no vendor advisory or firmware update addressing the flaws has been identified. The CVE’s EPSS score rose from a low baseline to a recorded peak of 0.2264, indicating measurable post-disclosure exploitation interest that warrants renewed attention from defenders.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-33339
Vulnerability Data
TOTOLINK X18 V9.1.0cu.2024_B20220329 was discovered to contain multiple command injection vulnerabilities via the rtLogEnabled and rtLogServer parameters in the setSyslogCfg function.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8V1.2.9
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.
Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.