Security Resilience

CVE-2023-30520

XSS in Jenkins Quay.Io Trigger ≤ 0.1

Published
12 April 2023
Modified
07 February 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0048 40th percentile
Risk Priority 50 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-30520 is a medium-severity Cross-site Scripting (CWE-79) vulnerability in Jenkins Quay.Io Trigger. Its CVSS base score is 5.4 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Protocol or Service Impersonation (T1001.003); ranked at the 40th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

The Jenkins Quay.io trigger Plugin version 0.1 and earlier contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability because it fails to restrict URL schemes on repository homepage URLs received through Quay.io trigger webhooks. The affected component is the webhook processing logic within this Jenkins plugin, which directly incorporates unvalidated input into stored pages.

Attackers who can submit crafted Quay.io trigger webhook payloads are able to exploit the flaw to achieve stored XSS, allowing execution of arbitrary scripts in the context of other users who view the affected Jenkins pages. The vulnerability carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4, reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, and required privileges combined with user interaction.

The Jenkins security advisory SECURITY-2850, published on 2023-04-12, addresses the issue and is referenced alongside related disclosures on the Openwall mailing list. No further mitigation details such as specific configuration changes or workarounds are provided in the available references.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Jenkins Quay.io trigger Plugin 0.1 and earlier does not limit URL schemes for repository homepage URLs submitted via Quay.io trigger webhooks, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers able to submit crafted Quay.io trigger webhook payloads.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001.003 Protocol or Service Impersonation Command And Control
Adversaries may impersonate legitimate protocols or web service traffic to disguise command and control activity and thwart analysis efforts.
T1003.004 LSA Secrets Credential Access
Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.
T1003.005 Cached Domain Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access cached domain credentials used to allow authentication to occur in the event a domain controller is unavailable.
T1007 System Service Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may try to gather information about registered local system services.
T1011 Exfiltration Over Other Network Medium Exfiltration
Adversaries may attempt to exfiltrate data over a different network medium than the command and control channel.
T1012 Query Registry Discovery
Adversaries may interact with the Windows Registry to gather information about the system, configuration, and installed software.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-28669Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-27898Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-27905Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-35145Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-46650Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-25762Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-25761Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-40346Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-46659Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-35143Same vendor: Jenkins

Affected Assets

jenkins
quay.io trigger
≤ 0.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.1.2
  • V1.3.2

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-79

Penetration testing submits XSS payloads to web applications, detecting cross-site scripting flaws for subsequent remediation.

addresses: CWE-79

Validates web inputs to reject script-related content that could produce XSS.

addresses: CWE-79

Output validation against expected content can reject or sanitize script content in generated web pages, reducing XSS exploitability.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices directly target introduction of XSS via coding standards/testing (mostly), yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors unaddressed (partial).

PR.PS-02 partial match
blocks

Patching and EOL replacement can remediate known XSS instances in libraries or frameworks (partial) but do nothing to enforce input neutralization in application code (none).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

removes
removes
removes
removes
blocks

A.5.6 only promotes membership in groups to improve knowledge, receive alerts, and share information; it performs no action that stops XSS exploitation (or even the underlying neutralization defect) and is a pure dependency for other controls per the owner's labeling rule.

References