CVE-2023-3114

Periodic review and update of procedures reduces incorrect authorization implementations over time.

Supervision identifies cases where authorization logic incorrectly permits unauthorized actions.

Explicitly specifying privileges and group/role memberships for accounts reduces the risk of incorrect privilege assignments.

Defining permitted attribute values and auditing modifications reduces the chance of incorrect authorization outcomes due to tampered or missing labels.

The authorization process and usage restrictions help prevent incorrect authorization for remote access types.

Establishing configuration and connection requirements helps ensure correct rather than incorrect authorization for wireless access.

Establishing connection authorization processes for mobile devices helps ensure authorization decisions are correctly implemented rather than incorrect.

Ensures authorization decisions for external system use are correctly implemented and enforced.

Directly enforces least-privilege policy definition, management, and review that prevents incorrect privilege assignments.

A.5.15 directly requires determining access needs, defining/enforcing topic-specific access control policy and rules (including need-to-know, privilege restrictions, segregation, formal authorization, role-based mapping, and consistency with classification), which stops most incorrect privilege assignments from being exploitable; the bounded remainder is incorrect assignments that arise from flawed implementation of those rules rather than from their absence.

A.5.18's provisioning, review, revocation and SoD rules (esp. a,b,c,f,i,j) directly stop most incorrect privilege assignments from being granted or persisting, with a bounded remainder in flawed implementation of the authorization step itself (see 5.9/5.15 dependency)