Security Resilience

CVE-2023-31476

RCE in Gl-Inet Gl-Mv1000W Firmware ≤ 3.215

Published
09 May 2023
Modified
29 January 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0080 56th percentile
Risk Priority 59 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-31476 is a high-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Gl-Inet Gl-Mv1000W Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 44% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An issue was discovered on GL.iNet devices running firmware before 3.216. There is an arbitrary file write in which an empty file can be created almost anywhere on the filesystem, as long as the filename and path is no more…

more

than 6 characters (the working directory is /www).

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-31473Same product: Gl-Inet Gl-Mv1000
CVE-2025-67089Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2026-26792Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2026-26795Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2026-26793Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2026-26791Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2024-39226Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2023-50445Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2023-31477Same product: Gl-Inet Gl-Mv1000
CVE-2023-31475Same product: Gl-Inet Gl-Mv1000

Affected Assets

gl-inet
gl-mv1000w firmware
≤ 3.215
gl-inet
gl-mv1000 firmware
≤ 3.215

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reduce command injection defects, but leaves a minority slice (e.g. incomplete implementation of those practices, outsourced development without full assurance, or post-SDLC changes) where the weakness can still arise and be exploitable.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (e.g. distrust external input, secure session control, data validation/sanitization, least privilege) and design reviews that can stop command injection from being introduced, but this is only a minority slice of CWE-77 because the weakness can still arise in code that bypasses those principles, in non-reviewed components, or in runtime injection vectors the architecture review does not reach.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-77, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References