Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-32465

Dell Powerprotect Cyber Recovery 19.4 – 19.13.0.2

Published
14 June 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0073 51th percentile
Risk Priority 65 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-32465 is a high-severity Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax (CWE-644) vulnerability in Dell Powerprotect Cyber Recovery. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked in the top 49% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Dell Power Protect Cyber Recovery, contains an Authentication Bypass vulnerability. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized admin access to the Cyber Recovery application. Exploitation may lead to complete system takeover by an attacker.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-26335Same product: Dell Powerprotect Cyber Recovery
CVE-2026-10836Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-2950Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-24339Shared CWE-644
CVE-2024-40686Shared CWE-644
CVE-2026-33149Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-64425Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-36223Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-70948Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-52647Shared CWE-644

Affected Assets

dell
powerprotect cyber recovery
19.4 — 19.13.0.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V4.2.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper output encoding and header sanitization to prevent scripting injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing catches header-injection issues before release, covering most of the weakness.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevents header-injection flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for neutralizing untrusted data in HTTP headers.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce injection surfaces but do not prescribe header-specific controls.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping or rejection of scripting syntax in HTTP headers.

References