Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2023-33782 is a high-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Dlink Dir-842V2 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 2% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
D-Link DIR-842V2 firmware version 1.0.3 contains a command injection vulnerability in its iperf3 diagnostics function. The flaw is tracked as CVE-2023-33782, carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8, and is categorized under CWE-77. It allows an attacker to supply crafted input that is executed directly by the underlying operating system.
An authenticated user with network access can trigger the flaw without user interaction, resulting in arbitrary command execution on the device. Successful exploitation grants the attacker the ability to read, modify, or delete data and to disrupt device operation, consistent with the high impact ratings across confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Public references point to a D-Link security bulletin page and a proof-of-concept repository that demonstrates the issue. No specific patch version or mitigation steps are detailed in the supplied references. The associated EPSS score currently stands at 0.5194 with a recorded peak of 0.5221, indicating sustained exploitation interest since disclosure.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-37933
Vulnerability Data
D-Link DIR-842V2 v1.0.3 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the iperf3 diagnostics function.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8V1.2.9
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.