Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-4010

DoS in Redhat Enterprise Linux 8.0 … 9.0

Public PoCDoS
Published
31 July 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 4.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0052 41th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-4010 is a medium-severity Infinite Loop (CWE-835) vulnerability in Redhat Enterprise Linux. Its CVSS base score is 4.6 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 41th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in the USB Host Controller Driver framework in the Linux kernel. The usb_giveback_urb function has a logic loophole in its implementation. Due to the inappropriate judgment condition of the goto statement, the function cannot return under…

more

the input of a specific malformed descriptor file, so it falls into an endless loop, resulting in a denial of service.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-28327Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-50074Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-0775Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-3812Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-3640Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-0841Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-2019Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-5090Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-0562Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-0639Same product: Linux Linux Kernel

Affected Assets

linux
linux kernel
all versions
redhat
enterprise linux
8.0, 9.0

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-835

Enables transfer to alternate site if an infinite loop at the primary renders processing unavailable.

addresses: CWE-835

Detects and mitigates infinite loops that produce sustained resource consumption.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (reviews, testing, static analysis) directly prevent introduction of infinite-loop defects.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Static analysis and vuln scanning during asset assessment can detect unreachable loop exits.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can uncover infinite-loop conditions before release.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates practices that can detect and prevent infinite-loop defects.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify loop-termination rules, indirectly reducing the weakness.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address loop termination and prevent infinite loops.

none

Secure architecture principles encourage designs that avoid unreachable exit conditions.

none

Change management can require review of loop logic when code is modified.

References