Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-51699

Command Injection in Linuxfoundation Fluid ≤ 0.9.3

Command Injection
Published
15 March 2024
Modified
09 April 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0061 46th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-51699 is a medium-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Linuxfoundation Fluid. Its CVSS base score is 4.0 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 46th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Fluid is an open source Kubernetes-native Distributed Dataset Orchestrator and Accelerator for data-intensive applications. An OS command injection vulnerability within the Fluid project's JuicefsRuntime can potentially allow an authenticated user, who has the authority to create or update the K8s…

more

CRD Dataset/JuicefsRuntime, to execute arbitrary OS commands within the juicefs related containers. This could lead to unauthorized access, modification or deletion of data. Users who're using versions < 0.9.3 with JuicefsRuntime should upgrade to v0.9.3.

CWE(s)
CWE-78

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-30840Same product: Linuxfoundation Fluid
CVE-2024-25626Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-27965Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-24905Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2023-37032Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2024-21418Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2025-59350Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-41579Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-27813Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2023-24805Same vendor: Linuxfoundation

Affected Assets

linuxfoundation
fluid
≤ 0.9.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

SC-27 Platform-independent Applications
addresses: CWE-78

Platform-independent apps typically execute inside a managed runtime or sandbox that restricts direct OS command execution, reducing the ability to exploit OS command injection.

SI-10 Information Input Validation
addresses: CWE-78

Validates inputs to block special elements that would alter OS command execution.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
detects

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References