Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-52308

Paddlepaddle ≤ 2.6.0

Published
03 January 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0049 40th percentile
Risk Priority 39 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-52308 is a medium-severity Divide By Zero (CWE-369) vulnerability in Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle. Its CVSS base score is 4.7 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 40th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

FPE in paddle.amin in PaddlePaddle before 2.6.0. This flaw can cause a runtime crash and a denial of service.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-38675Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle
CVE-2023-38677Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle
CVE-2023-38674Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle
CVE-2023-52305Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle
CVE-2023-38672Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle
CVE-2023-52306Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle
CVE-2023-52313Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle
CVE-2023-52303Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle
CVE-2023-38676Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle
CVE-2023-38670Same product: Paddlepaddle Paddlepaddle

Affected Assets

paddlepaddle
paddlepaddle
≤ 2.6.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including static/dynamic analysis) finds divide-by-zero conditions after they have been coded.

Security engineering principles can require safe-arithmetic constructs or explicit guards that keep division operands nonzero.

Validating numeric inputs before use as divisors structurally blocks zero values from reaching division operations.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly include code analysis, input validation, and testing that prevent divide-by-zero errors.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover divide-by-zero flaws via static analysis or testing.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching and replacement can remediate divide-by-zero bugs present in deployed software.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect divide-by-zero conditions before release.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes input validation and error-handling practices that can prevent divide-by-zero faults.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate checks for zero denominators and safe arithmetic handling.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage defensive coding patterns that avoid arithmetic exceptions.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require validation to prevent divide-by-zero and similar runtime faults.

References