Security Resilience

CVE-2023-6985

Access Control in 10Web Ai Assistant ≤ 1.0.19

Published
05 February 2024
Modified
08 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.014 71th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-6985 is a medium-severity Missing Authorization (CWE-862) vulnerability in 10Web Ai Assistant. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked in the top 29% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as Enterprise AI Assistants.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-24 (Access Control Decisions) and AC-25 (Reference Monitor) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

The 10Web AI Assistant plugin for WordPress is affected by an authorization vulnerability (CWE-862) in all versions through 1.0.18. The root cause is a missing capability check on the install_plugin AJAX action, which permits unauthorized modification of site data. The issue carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 with network attack vector and low-privilege requirements.

Authenticated attackers holding subscriber-level access or higher can invoke the unprotected AJAX handler to install arbitrary plugins. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce additional code that may lead to further site compromise, such as privilege escalation or persistent access.

Public references from Wordfence and the WordPress plugin repository point to changeset 3027004, which addresses the missing authorization check in the plugin’s main file. Site administrators should apply the available plugin update to remediate the flaw.

EPSS values have remained essentially flat near 0.078 with no material increase after disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The 10Web AI Assistant – AI content writing assistant plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the install_plugin AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.18. This makes…

more

it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to install arbitrary plugins that can be used to gain further access to a compromised site.

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
Enterprise AI Assistants
Risk Domain
N/A
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
Matched keywords: ai, ai

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-9630Same vendor: 10Web
CVE-2024-35628Same vendor: 10Web
CVE-2024-33586Same vendor: 10Web
CVE-2023-33995Same vendor: 10Web
CVE-2023-45272Same vendor: 10Web
CVE-2024-9628Same vendor: 10Web
CVE-2023-47807Same vendor: 10Web
CVE-2024-4520Shared CWE-862
CVE-2024-52383Shared CWE-862
CVE-2025-31774Shared CWE-862

Affected Assets

10web
ai assistant
≤ 1.0.19

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

AC-3 directly requires enforcement of authorization decisions on every access request, structurally eliminating missing authorization checks.

AC-24 mandates that access control decisions are applied to each request, preventing bypass of authorization logic.

AC-25 requires a tamperproof, always-invoked reference monitor that ensures authorization checks cannot be omitted.

AC-6 reduces the set of actions reachable without proper authorization, limiting blast radius of missing checks.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Requiring formal authorization of every access request before rights are granted ensures that checks for required permissions are performed, preventing missing authorization checks from being introduced.

blocks

A.5.18's provisioning, review, revocation and activation steps (incl. owner approval, SoD, timely removal on role/termination change) directly stop exploitation of missing authorization checks by ensuring no actor receives or retains rights to resources they should not access; the bounded remainder is that it cannot stop missing-authorization defects inside the enforcement mechanism itself once rights have been granted (e.g. flawed code that ignores the rights table).

finds

By requiring competent outsiders to verify that every function enforces the need-to-know principle, the control lowers the likelihood that missing authorization checks persist undetected.

blocks

A.5.8 integrates risk assessment, requirements elicitation and governance into the project lifecycle so that authorization needs can be identified and specified; it does not itself perform or enforce authorization checks, so the missing-authorization weakness can still be present and exploitable.

blocks

Security checkpoints and explicit authorization requirements in the design phase ensure that every sensitive function is paired with an access-control check, reducing missing-authorization defects.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (least privilege, default deny, security architecture integration, zero-trust never-trust/always-verify, dynamic access control) plus design reviews that directly specify and enforce authorization checks before access; this stops most missing-authorization cases from being exploitable, with a bounded remainder in non-architectural or legacy components where the principles were documented but not fully applied.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-862, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References