Security Resilience

CVE-2024-10429

RCE in Wavlink Wn530H4 Firmware 20220721

Published
27 October 2024
Modified
13 November 2024
CVSS Score v4 8.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.18 97th percentile
Risk Priority 48 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-10429 is a high-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Wavlink Wn530H4 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.6 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 3% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

A critical command injection vulnerability exists in the set_ipv6 function within the internet.cgi file of WAVLINK WN530H4, WN530HG4, and WN572HG3 routers up to firmware version 20221028. The flaw arises from improper handling of the IPv6OpMode, IPv6IPAddr, IPv6WANIPAddr, and IPv6GWAddr arguments, which can be manipulated to execute arbitrary commands on the device. It carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 8.6 and is tracked under CWE-77.

An authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges can exploit the issue over the network to achieve full control over the affected router, including arbitrary command execution with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Public exploit code has been disclosed, enabling potential use by threat actors, though no vendor patch or response has been issued despite early notification.

The provided references consist of vulnerability database entries and a disclosure document but contain no mitigation guidance or patch details. The EPSS score remains flat at 0.3287 with no material increase observed after publication.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in WAVLINK WN530H4, WN530HG4 and WN572HG3 up to 20221028. Affected is the function set_ipv6 of the file internet.cgi. The manipulation of the argument IPv6OpMode/IPv6IPAddr/IPv6WANIPAddr/IPv6GWAddr leads to command injection. It is possible to…

more

launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-10428Same product: Wavlink Wn530H4
CVE-2024-10193Same product: Wavlink Wn530H4
CVE-2024-10194Same product: Wavlink Wn530H4
CVE-2024-39367Same vendor: Wavlink
CVE-2023-38861Same vendor: Wavlink
CVE-2024-34166Same vendor: Wavlink
CVE-2024-39764Same vendor: Wavlink
CVE-2024-38894Same vendor: Wavlink
CVE-2024-48705Same vendor: Wavlink
CVE-2025-44868Same vendor: Wavlink

Affected Assets

wavlink
wn530h4 firmware
20220721
wavlink
wn530hg4 firmware
20220809
wavlink
wn572hg3 firmware
20221028

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reduce command injection defects, but leaves a minority slice (e.g. incomplete implementation of those practices, outsourced development without full assurance, or post-SDLC changes) where the weakness can still arise and be exploitable.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (e.g. distrust external input, secure session control, data validation/sanitization, least privilege) and design reviews that can stop command injection from being introduced, but this is only a minority slice of CWE-77 because the weakness can still arise in code that bypasses those principles, in non-reviewed components, or in runtime injection vectors the architecture review does not reach.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-77, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References