CVE-2024-10654
Published: 01 November 2024
Summary
CVE-2024-10654 is a medium-severity Incorrect Privilege Assignment (CWE-266) vulnerability in Totolink Lr350 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 6.9 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 16.9% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-33225
Vulnerability details
A vulnerability has been found in TOTOLINK LR350 up to 9.3.5u.6369 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /formLoginAuth.htm. The manipulation of the argument authCode with the input 1 leads to authorization…
more
bypass. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 9.3.5u.6698_B20230810 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Why these techniques?
CVE-2024-10654 enables remote authorization bypass in the TOTOLINK LR350 router's web management interface (/formLoginAuth.htm) via manipulation of the authCode parameter, facilitating exploitation of a public-facing application for unauthorized access.
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Documented procedures facilitate correct implementation and ongoing management of authorization decisions.
Periodic reviews identify and correct flaws in authorization decisions or enforcement.
Specifying access authorizations for each account and requiring approvals for account requests enforces proper authorization decisions.
The control mandates authorization decisions for each access request, reducing the ability to exploit improper authorization weaknesses.
The control requires checking and applying authorization decisions per policy, preventing improper authorization.
The control requires explicit definition of separated access authorizations, making incorrect privilege assignments that bundle conflicting duties harder to implement.
Ensures privileges are assigned only as necessary rather than incorrectly over-granted.
The control's documentation requirement reduces improper authorization by ensuring only mission-justified actions bypass authentication.