Security Resilience

CVE-2024-10956

Binary-Husky Gpt Academic 3.83

Public PoC
Published
20 March 2025
Modified
15 July 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 7.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0035 27th percentile
Risk Priority 53 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-10956 is a high-severity Origin Validation Error (CWE-346) vulnerability in Binary-Husky Gpt Academic. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 27th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as LLM Application Platforms; in the Supply Chain and Deployment risk domain.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and IA-3 (Device Identification and Authentication) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-10956 is a Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) vulnerability affecting GPT Academy version 3.83 in the binary-husky/gpt_academic GitHub repository. The flaw stems from insufficient WebSocket authentication and lack of origin validation, enabling attackers to hijack existing WebSocket connections between a victim's browser and the server. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N) and is associated with CWE-346 (Origin Validation Error).

An attacker can exploit this vulnerability without privileges by tricking a victim into visiting a malicious webpage via social engineering or other means requiring user interaction. Once the victim loads the attacker's page, it hijacks the active WebSocket connection to the GPT Academy server, allowing unauthorized actions such as deleting the victim's conversation history without consent. This results in high integrity impact with low confidentiality impact and no availability disruption.

Mitigation details and additional technical analysis are provided in the Huntr advisory at https://huntr.com/bounties/0f8403ad-5f60-4eb9-9f51-8fbd2e41eda4.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

GPT Academy version 3.83 in the binary-husky/gpt_academic repository is vulnerable to Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH). This vulnerability allows an attacker to hijack an existing WebSocket connection between the victim's browser and the server, enabling unauthorized actions such as deleting conversation…

more

history without the victim's consent. The issue arises due to insufficient WebSocket authentication and lack of origin validation.

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
LLM Application Platforms
Risk Domain
Supply Chain and Deployment
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
Matched keywords: gpt

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-10954Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2024-31224Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2025-25185Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2024-10100Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2024-10986Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2026-0763Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2024-11030Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2024-10950Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2024-11037Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2024-10101Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic

Affected Assets

binary-husky
gpt academic
3.83

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement directly requires validating the source of data before allowing transmission or receipt.

Device identification and authentication mandates verifying the source before establishing connections.

Session authenticity mechanisms require validation that communications originate from the expected party.

Boundary protection at interfaces enforces checks on the origin of incoming communications.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Network security controls enforce origin validation at network boundaries.

degrades

Security of network services includes validating the authenticity of service endpoints.

blocks

A.8.26 requires identifying and specifying requirements for resilience against malicious attacks including SQL injections and input validation (items d, j), plus related protections (authentication, segregation, cryptography per 8.24), which can address some but not most origin validation scenarios such as those involving untrusted cross-origin requests or implicit trust in sources.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (defense-in-depth, least privilege, assume-breach, distrust-external-input, zero-trust verification) plus design reviews that can catch and block origin-validation gaps in many common cases, but leaves a bounded remainder (e.g. protocol-level or third-party component origin errors not surfaced by the organization's review process).

prevents

Secure coding practices include implementing proper origin validation to prevent spoofing.

blocks

Secure authentication verifies identity but does not address origin validation of arbitrary data flows.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-346, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References