Security Resilience

CVE-2024-12356

RCE in Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access ≤ 24.3.1

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedPublic PoCRCECommand Injection
Published
17 December 2024
Modified
24 October 2025
KEV Added
19 December 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.87 99.8th percentile
Risk Priority 97 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-12356 is a critical-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, ranked in the top 0.2% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

A critical command injection vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-12356 and assigned CWE-77, affects BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) products. The flaw permits an unauthenticated attacker to inject and execute commands that run with the privileges of a site user, carrying a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 that reflects network-accessible exploitation without credentials or user interaction and full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the weakness over the network to run arbitrary commands as a site user, enabling complete compromise of the affected system and any data or resources accessible to that account.

The BeyondTrust security advisory BT24-10 and the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog both address the issue, confirming active exploitation in the wild. The associated EPSS score stands at 0.9386 with an identical peak value, indicating sustained high exploitation interest since disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A critical vulnerability has been discovered in Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) products which can allow an unauthenticated attacker to inject commands that are run as a site user.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
19 December 2024

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-4310Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access
CVE-2024-12686Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Accessboth on KEV
CVE-2026-1731Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Accessboth on KEV
CVE-2025-5309Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access
CVE-2026-40138Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access
CVE-2026-40139Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access
CVE-2026-40141Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access
CVE-2026-40140Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access
CVE-2023-23632Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access
CVE-2025-0217Same product: Beyondtrust Privileged Remote Access

Affected Assets

beyondtrust
privileged remote access
≤ 24.3.1
beyondtrust
remote support
≤ 24.3.1

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reduce command injection defects, but leaves a minority slice (e.g. incomplete implementation of those practices, outsourced development without full assurance, or post-SDLC changes) where the weakness can still arise and be exploitable.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (e.g. distrust external input, secure session control, data validation/sanitization, least privilege) and design reviews that can stop command injection from being introduced, but this is only a minority slice of CWE-77 because the weakness can still arise in code that bypasses those principles, in non-reviewed components, or in runtime injection vectors the architecture review does not reach.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-77, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References