Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-1882

Papercut Mf ≤ 20.1.10

Published
14 March 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.014 70th percentile
Risk Priority 61 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-1882 is a high-severity Improper Neutralization of Equivalent Special Elements (CWE-76) vulnerability in Papercut Papercut Mf. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 30% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-1882 is a remote code execution vulnerability affecting the PaperCut NG/MF application server. It stems from improper handling of a malicious payload that an authenticated administrator can create, as indicated by the associated CWEs including CWE-76. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 with network attack vector, low complexity, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

An already authenticated admin user can supply the crafted payload to execute arbitrary code on the server hosting the PaperCut application. This requires administrative credentials but no user interaction, allowing the attacker to fully compromise the server once the payload is processed.

The vendor has published a security bulletin detailing the issue at the referenced URL. The EPSS score rose materially from a low baseline to a peak of 0.0916 on 2025-12-11 before receding to the current value of 0.0135, indicating that exploitation interest emerged after disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

This vulnerability allows an already authenticated admin user to create a malicious payload that could be leveraged for remote code execution on the server hosting the PaperCut NG/MF application server.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-1221Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-1883Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-1222Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-1884Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-1654Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-1223Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-38229Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-43498Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-11395Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-21171Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

papercut
papercut mf
≤ 20.1.10 · 21.0.0 — 21.2.14 · 22.0.0 — 22.1.5
papercut
papercut ng
≤ 20.1.10 · 21.0.0 — 21.2.14 · 22.0.0 — 22.1.5

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 requires developer testing and evaluation that can discover failures to neutralize equivalent special elements.

SI-10 requires validation of information inputs, directly stopping incomplete neutralization of equivalent special elements.

SA-8 mandates security engineering principles such as complete input validation and sanitization that cover equivalent special-element forms.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require consistent neutralization of all equivalent special elements during input validation and sanitization.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect incomplete neutralization but does not prevent the weakness itself.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and neutralization of all equivalent special elements.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for handling special characters and equivalent encodings.

prevents

Secure system architecture principles require consistent canonicalization and neutralization of equivalent inputs.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address proper neutralization of all equivalent special elements.

References