Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-26229

Memory Safety in Microsoft Windows 10 1507 ≤ 10.0.10240.20596

Published
09 April 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.094 95th percentile
Risk Priority 83 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-26229 is a high-severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 10 1507. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 5% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-26229 is an elevation-of-privilege vulnerability in the Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) Service. It carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 and is associated with CWE-122. The flaw permits a local attacker to obtain full control over the affected system when successfully exploited.

An attacker who already possesses a low-privileged local account can trigger the vulnerability without user interaction. Successful exploitation grants the attacker the ability to read, write, or delete arbitrary data and to execute code with the highest privileges on the host.

Microsoft’s Security Response Center advisory for CVE-2024-26229 directs administrators to apply the security updates released on the April 2024 Patch Tuesday. The update addresses the underlying memory-corruption condition in the CSC service and is the primary recommended mitigation.

The vulnerability’s EPSS score currently stands at 0.8559 with a recorded peak of 0.8639, indicating sustained exploitation interest following disclosure.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-26210Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-38079Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-26179Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2023-36425Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2023-21740Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-21370Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-26200Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-21347Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2023-35630Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507
CVE-2024-21368Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1507

Affected Assets

microsoft
windows 10 1507
≤ 10.0.10240.20596 · ≤ 10.0.10240.20596
microsoft
windows 10 1607
≤ 10.0.14393.6897 · ≤ 10.0.14393.6897
microsoft
windows 10 1809
≤ 10.0.17763.5696
microsoft
windows 10 21h2
≤ 10.0.19044.4291
microsoft
windows 10 22h2
≤ 10.0.19045.4291
microsoft
windows 11 21h2
≤ 10.0.22000.2899
microsoft
windows 11 22h2
≤ 10.0.22621.3447
microsoft
windows 11 23h2
≤ 10.0.22631.3447
microsoft
windows server 2008
all versions, r2
microsoft
windows server 2012
r2
+4 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and memory-error detectors) can discover heap overflows after they have been coded.

Input validation enforces bounds checking on data written to heap buffers, directly stopping the overflow condition from being introduced.

Security engineering principles require use of memory-safe constructs and bounds-checked allocation routines that avoid introducing heap overflows.

Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability of a heap overflow to execute attacker-controlled code or corrupt adjacent structures.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 full match
prevents

Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover heap-overflow flaws but does not prevent their introduction in code.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Timely patching removes known heap-overflow instances after they exist.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect heap overflows before release.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates practices that reduce the likelihood of introducing heap overflows.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory APIs that mitigate heap overflows.

prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safety and input-validation controls that address heap overflows.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prescribe techniques (safe functions, bounds checks) that prevent heap-based buffer overflows.

References