Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-29202

RCE in Fit2Cloud Jumpserver 3.0.0 – 3.10.7

Public PoCRCE
Published
29 March 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.9
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.059 93th percentile
Risk Priority 94 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-29202 is a critical-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Fit2Cloud Jumpserver. Its CVSS base score is 9.9 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 7% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

JumpServer, an open source bastion host and operations security audit platform, contains a Jinja2 template injection flaw in its Ansible integration that permits arbitrary code execution inside the Celery container. The vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2024-29202, carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.9, and is classified under CWE-94; it was addressed in version 3.10.7.

An authenticated attacker with low privileges can supply a malicious template that runs with root privileges and full database access inside the Celery container, enabling theft of credentials and sensitive data from all managed hosts or direct manipulation of the JumpServer database.

The official GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-2vvr-vmvx-73ch and the accompanying SonarSource analysis both state that upgrading to JumpServer 3.10.7 or later eliminates the template-injection vector; administrators are advised to apply the update promptly and to restrict Ansible template privileges where possible.

The EPSS score has reached a peak of 0.8368 with a current value of 0.7998, indicating sustained exploitation interest after disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

JumpServer is an open source bastion host and an operation and maintenance security audit system. Attackers can exploit a Jinja2 template injection vulnerability in JumpServer's Ansible to execute arbitrary code within the Celery container. Since the Celery container runs with…

more

root privileges and has database access, attackers could steal sensitive information from all hosts or manipulate the database. This vulnerability is fixed in v3.10.7.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.002 AppleScript Execution
Adversaries may abuse AppleScript for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.005 Visual Basic Execution
Adversaries may abuse Visual Basic (VB) for execution.
T1059.006 Python Execution
Adversaries may abuse Python commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-43651Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver
CVE-2024-29201Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver
CVE-2023-43652Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver
CVE-2025-62712Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver
CVE-2025-62795Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver
CVE-2024-40628Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver
CVE-2024-29024Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver
CVE-2024-29020Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver
CVE-2024-40629Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver
CVE-2023-42819Same product: Fit2Cloud Jumpserver

Affected Assets

fit2cloud
jumpserver
3.0.0 — 3.10.7

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation finds code paths that accept and execute externally influenced strings.

Input validation directly stops untrusted data from being used to construct executable code without neutralization.

Least privilege limits the damage an injected code fragment can perform once executed.

Requiring documented secure development standards and tools enforces use of safe code-generation APIs and escaping.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).

PR.DS-10 none match
prevents

PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Banning unapproved code samples and unauthenticated web services, combined with secure-coding standards and SAST, prevents the dynamic generation or inclusion of attacker-supplied code.

none

Controls that restrict unauthorized or malicious code from being introduced via external networks or removable media limit opportunities for an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code.

References