CVE-2024-3009
Command Injection in Tenda Fh1205 Firmware 2.0.0.7\(775\)
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:LCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2024-3009 is a medium-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Tenda Fh1205 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 6.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 6% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A command injection vulnerability exists in Tenda FH1205 firmware version 2.0.0.7(775). The flaw resides in the formWriteFacMac function of the /goform/WriteFacMac endpoint, where unsanitized input to the mac parameter is passed to an operating system command. The issue is tracked as CVE-2024-3009, assigned CWE-77, and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3.
An authenticated remote attacker can supply a crafted mac value to execute arbitrary commands on the device. Because the attack requires only low-privileged credentials and no user interaction, an adversary who obtains or guesses valid administrative credentials can achieve limited control over the router’s configuration and runtime environment. A public proof-of-concept has been released, confirming the vector.
No vendor patch or mitigation guidance has been issued; the manufacturer did not respond to disclosure. The associated EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0591 since publication, indicating no measurable increase in observed exploitation interest.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-31617
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability has been found in Tenda FH1205 2.0.0.7(775) and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formWriteFacMac of the file /goform/WriteFacMac. The manipulation of the argument mac leads to command injection. The attack can be launched…
more
remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-258295. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8V1.2.9
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.
Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.
Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.