Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-36675

SSRF in Lylme Spage 1.9.5

Public PoCSSRF
Published
04 June 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 9.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.014 71th percentile
Risk Priority 87 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-36675 is a critical-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Lylme Lylme Spage. Its CVSS base score is 9.1 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 29% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

LyLme_spage version 1.9.5 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the get_head function, tracked as CVE-2024-36675 and assigned CWE-918. The flaw received a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.1, reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, and no requirements for authentication or user interaction, with impacts rated high for confidentiality and integrity.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can supply crafted input to the affected function and cause the application to issue arbitrary requests to internal or external resources, enabling retrieval or manipulation of data that would otherwise be inaccessible.

The two provided references both point to the same GitHub issue thread for the project, but contain no explicit statements on patches or mitigation steps. The associated EPSS score reached a peak of 0.4940 with a current value of 0.4428; absent a documented low starting value, this does not indicate a material post-disclosure climb requiring renewed attention.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

LyLme_spage v1.9.5 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the get_head function.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-9788Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage
CVE-2023-45951Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage
CVE-2024-9789Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage
CVE-2024-48357Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage
CVE-2024-48356Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage
CVE-2024-9790Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage
CVE-2024-36674Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage
CVE-2023-45952Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage
CVE-2024-34982Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage
CVE-2024-48176Same product: Lylme Lylme Spage

Affected Assets

lylme
lylme spage
1.9.5

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V5.3.2
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.

Input validation directly stops untrusted URLs from being accepted and fetched without destination checks.

Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.

References