Security Resilience

CVE-2024-5488

RCE in Seopress ≤ 7.9

Published
09 July 2024
Modified
21 May 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.037 90th percentile
Risk Priority 97 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-5488 is a critical-severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502) vulnerability in Seopress Seopress. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203); ranked in the top 10% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

The SEOPress WordPress plugin before version 7.9 is affected by improper access controls on certain REST API routes. When combined with a separate object injection flaw (CWE-502), the issue permits unauthenticated deserialization of attacker-supplied gadget chains, resulting in a CVSS 9.8 rating that reflects network-exploitable impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can invoke the unprotected routes to supply malicious serialized objects. Successful exploitation requires the presence of a usable gadget chain within the WordPress installation and can fully compromise the site.

Public references published by WPScan detail the affected endpoints and the conditions under which the vulnerability can be triggered, indicating that administrators should apply the vendor fix released in SEOPress 7.9.

The associated EPSS score has remained elevated since disclosure, with a current value of 0.7186 and a recorded peak of 0.7480.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The SEOPress WordPress plugin before 7.9 does not properly protect some of its REST API routes, which combined with another Object Injection vulnerability can allow unauthenticated attackers to unserialize malicious gadget chains, compromising the site if a suitable chain is…

more

present.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-1669Same product: Seopress Seopress
CVE-2024-4900Same product: Seopress Seopress
CVE-2024-1134Same product: Seopress Seopress
CVE-2024-1168Same product: Seopress Seopress
CVE-2024-2165Same product: Seopress Seopress
CVE-2023-6290Same product: Seopress Seopress
CVE-2024-4899Same product: Seopress Seopress
CVE-2024-9225Same product: Seopress Seopress
CVE-2024-50455Same product: Seopress Seopress
CVE-2024-50456Same product: Seopress Seopress

Affected Assets

seopress
seopress
≤ 7.9

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can uncover deserialization flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops deserialization of untrusted data by ensuring inputs are valid before processing.

Engineering principles such as safe deserialization and input sanitization structurally prevent the weakness from being introduced.

Integrity verification tools can detect malformed or tampered serialized data after the fact.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing includes validation of deserialization routines and the use of untrusted data, reducing the likelihood that unsafe object reconstruction will be deployed.

prevents

Requiring vetted libraries, regular updates and SAST before release reduces the likelihood that deserialization logic will accept and act on attacker-controlled serialized objects.

finds

Regular scanning of third-party libraries and timely patching reduce the likelihood that unsafe deserialization vulnerabilities remain active.

References