Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-7214

Command Injection in Totolink Lr350 Firmware 9.3.5u.6369_b20220309

Published
30 July 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
CVSS Score v4 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.032 87th percentile
Risk Priority 40 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-7214 is a medium-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Totolink Lr350 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 13% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-7214 is a command injection vulnerability classified under CWE-77 in the TOTOLINK LR350 router firmware version 9.3.5u.6369_B20220309. It resides in the setWanCfg function within /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi, where unsanitized input to the hostName argument allows arbitrary command execution.

The flaw can be triggered remotely by an authenticated attacker who supplies a crafted hostName value, resulting in command injection with limited effects on confidentiality, integrity, and availability as reflected in its CVSS 4.0 score of 5.3. Public exploit code has been released, enabling potential unauthorized command execution on affected devices.

References such as the GitHub disclosure and Vuldb entries detail the issue and proof-of-concept, yet the vendor received early notification and provided no response or patch information. The associated EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0584 with no material rise since disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability has been found in TOTOLINK LR350 9.3.5u.6369_B20220309 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function setWanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. The manipulation of the argument hostName leads to command injection. The attack can be launched…

more

remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-272785 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.008 Network Device CLI Execution
Adversaries may abuse scripting or built-in command line interpreters (CLI) on network devices to execute malicious command and payloads.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-37149Same product: Totolink Lr350
CVE-2023-37148Same product: Totolink Lr350
CVE-2023-37145Same product: Totolink Lr350
CVE-2024-36783Same product: Totolink Lr350
CVE-2023-37146Same product: Totolink Lr350
CVE-2026-1150Same product: Totolink Lr350
CVE-2026-1149Same product: Totolink Lr350
CVE-2025-63465Same product: Totolink Lr350
CVE-2025-63463Same product: Totolink Lr350
CVE-2025-63467Same product: Totolink Lr350

Affected Assets

totolink
lr350 firmware
9.3.5u.6369_b20220309

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V1.2.9

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.

none

Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.

References