CVE-2025-14749
Published: 16 December 2025
Summary
CVE-2025-14749 is a low-severity Incorrect Privilege Assignment (CWE-266) vulnerability in Shenzhenningyuandatechnology Tc155 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 2.1 (Low).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 11.1th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-203496
Vulnerability details
A vulnerability was identified in Ningyuanda TC155 57.0.2.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /onvif/device_service of the component ONVIF PTZ Control Interface. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. The attack requires being on the local network. The…
more
exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Why these techniques?
The improper access control vulnerability in the ONVIF PTZ Control Interface (/onvif/device_service) allows unauthenticated remote control from the local network, enabling exploitation of a public-facing web application (T1190), exploitation of remote services (T1210), and privilege escalation via unauthorized PTZ access (T1068).
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
The access control policy and procedures directly mandate and enforce proper access control mechanisms across the organization.
Supervision and review of access control activities directly detects and remediates improper access configurations or usages.
Defining account types, requiring approvals for creation, specifying authorizations, monitoring usage, and reviewing accounts directly prevents improper access control by ensuring only authorized accounts exist and are used.
The control requires explicit definition of separated access authorizations, making incorrect privilege assignments that bundle conflicting duties harder to implement.
Ensures privileges are assigned only as necessary rather than incorrectly over-granted.
Device lock enforces restricted access until re-authentication, directly reducing unauthorized use of active sessions.
Explicitly identifying and documenting actions permitted without identification or authentication enforces proper access control boundaries by defining justified exceptions.
By automatically labeling outputs with security attributes, the control supports attribute-based enforcement and reduces exploitability of improper access control weaknesses.