Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NSummary
CVE-2025-20915 is a medium-severity Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125) vulnerability in Samsung Notes. Its CVSS base score is 5.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 20th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-20915 is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability (CWE-125) in the Samsung Notes application, occurring during the processing of binary voice content. It affects versions of Samsung Notes prior to 4.4.26.71 on compatible Samsung devices. The flaw enables attackers to access memory outside the intended boundaries, potentially exposing sensitive data.
Exploitation requires local access to the device (AV:L) with low privileges (PR:L), low attack complexity (AC:L), and no user interaction (UI:N). Successful attacks result in high confidentiality impact (C:H) through memory disclosure, with no integrity or availability disruption (CVSS 5.5: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). Local users or malware with basic permissions could leverage this for information leakage.
Samsung's security advisory, published on 2025-03-06, details the vulnerability and mitigation at https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2025&month=03. Practitioners should recommend updating Samsung Notes to version 4.4.26.71 or later to address the issue.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-6145
Vulnerability Data
Out-of-bounds read in applying binary of voice content in Samsung Notes prior to version 4.4.26.71 allows attackers to read out-of-bounds memory.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation directly finds out-of-bounds read flaws through static analysis, fuzzing, and dynamic bounds checks.
Secure engineering principles require bounds checking and memory-safe constructs that stop out-of-bounds reads from being introduced.
Process isolation confines the effects of an out-of-bounds read to the compromised process.
Input validation rejects malformed indices or lengths that would otherwise cause reads outside buffer bounds.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices such as bounds checking and memory-safe languages directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover instances of out-of-bounds reads after code is deployed.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing out-of-bounds read flaws.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance includes fuzzing and static analysis that detect out-of-bounds read defects before release.
Logging can record evidence of an out-of-bounds read but does not prevent the weakness itself.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and bounds checking that directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Application security requirements include explicit bounds and memory-safety specifications that mitigate buffer over-reads.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles require memory-safe design patterns and runtime protections against out-of-bounds access.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe pointer arithmetic and mandate bounds-checked reads, eliminating CWE-125.