Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2025-3322 is a critical-severity Expression Language Injection (CWE-917) vulnerability in Bbraun (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 44th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
The vulnerability CVE-2025-3322 stems from improper neutralization of inputs used in an expression language, tracked as CWE-917. This flaw resides in a server-side component and permits remote code execution with the highest privileges. It received a maximum CVSS 4.0 score of 10.0 reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, and no prerequisites for authentication or user interaction, resulting in total loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the affected system and its security scope.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can supply crafted inputs that are evaluated by the expression language engine, achieving arbitrary code execution at root or equivalent level. Successful exploitation grants full control over the server, enabling data exfiltration, system modification, or denial of service without any local access or user assistance.
The vendor advisory published at https://www.bbraun.com/productsecurity outlines mitigation guidance for the affected products.
EPSS for this CVE has remained flat at 0.0221 with no material rise from its initial value.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-17092
Vulnerability Data
An improper neutralization of inputs used in expression language allows remote code execution with the highest privileges on the server.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.1.2V1.3.2V1.3.5V4.3.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Input validation directly requires checking and neutralizing special elements in externally influenced data before it is used to build executable statements such as EL expressions.
Security engineering principles include requirements for safe construction and sanitization of dynamic statements, structurally preventing expression-language injection at design time.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization and safe EL construction to prevent injection flaws.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect EL injection but does not itself implement the fix.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent expression-language injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including EL injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of expression-language statements.