Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-3328 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Tenda Ac1206 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 7% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-3328 exists in the Tenda AC1206 router running firmware version 15.03.06.23. It resides in the form_fast_setting_wifi_set function within the /goform/fast_setting_wifi_set endpoint, where unsanitized input to the ssid or timeZone parameters triggers a buffer overflow. The flaw is tracked under CWE-119, CWE-120, and CWE-787 and carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 reflecting network-accessible, low-complexity remote exploitation with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
An authenticated attacker with network connectivity can supply crafted values to the affected parameters and overflow the buffer, enabling remote code execution or denial of service. The vulnerability can be triggered without user interaction, and the public disclosure includes proof-of-concept material that demonstrates successful exploitation against the listed firmware.
Exploit details and additional parameter analysis have been published on GitHub along with entries in the Vuldb database; no vendor advisory or firmware patch addressing the issue is referenced in the available sources. The associated EPSS score remains low, moving only from 0.0222 to a peak of 0.0269.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-9942
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC1206 15.03.06.23. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function form_fast_setting_wifi_set of the file /goform/fast_setting_wifi_set. The manipulation of the argument ssid/timeZone leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack…
more
remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Other parameters might be affected as well.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.
Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.