Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-36051

Info Disclosure in Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager 7.5.0

Published
19 March 2026
Modified
24 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0010 1th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-36051 is a medium-severity Insertion of Sensitive Information into Externally-Accessible File or Directory (CWE-538) vulnerability in Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager. Its CVSS base score is 6.2 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 1th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SC-28 (Protection of Information at Rest) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 stores potentially sensitive information in configuration files that could be read by a local user.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-27269Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-26274Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-40367Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2020-4280Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-22875Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-30994Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-26273Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2024-47107Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-26276Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-27871Same product: Linux Linux Kernel

Affected Assets

ibm
qradar security information and event manager
7.5.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V14.1.2
  • V14.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Enforces file-system permissions so local users cannot read sensitive data stored in QRadar configuration files.

prevent

Requires cryptographic or equivalent protection of sensitive information at rest inside configuration files.

prevent

Limits local accounts and processes to the fewest privileges needed, reducing exposure of readable config-file contents.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Least-privilege file and directory permissions directly prevent unauthorized actors from reading sensitive data placed in accessible locations.

PR.DS-01 mostly match
prevents

Protecting data-at-rest encompasses file-level access controls and encryption that stop exposure of sensitive information in externally reachable paths.

PR.PS-01 partial match
prevents

Hardened configuration baselines and ongoing config management reduce the chance that sensitive data is written to world-readable files or directories.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

By ensuring that only the minimum necessary data is present in files or directories that may be reachable by external parties, the control lowers the impact of any subsequent exposure.

mitigates

Requiring visible or metadata labels on classified information helps ensure that files placed in externally accessible locations still carry an explicit sensitivity marker, lowering the likelihood of unnoticed exposure.

mitigates

The control’s requirement to remove or securely destroy information stored in externally accessible locations reduces the risk of sensitive data being left in files or directories that external parties can reach.

none

Logging disposals, selecting vetted external disposal services, and protecting media according to classification reduce the likelihood that sensitive information ends up in externally accessible files or directories.

none

Verifying and sanitizing equipment prior to disposal or resale prevents sensitive files or directories from remaining accessible to external parties who later obtain the hardware.

References