Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-4849

Command Injection in Totolink N300Rh Firmware 6.1c.1390_b20191101

Published
18 May 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.015 71th percentile
Risk Priority 37 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-4849 is a medium-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Totolink N300Rh Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 29% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

A command injection vulnerability affects the TOTOLINK N300RH router running firmware version 6.1c.1390_B20191101. The flaw resides in the CloudACMunualUpdateUserdata function within /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi, where unsanitized input to the url argument permits arbitrary command execution. It is tracked as CVE-2025-4849, assigned CWE-74 and CWE-77, and carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 5.3 reflecting network access with low privileges and limited impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

An authenticated remote attacker can supply a crafted url value to the CGI endpoint and execute operating-system commands on the device. Because the exploit has already been published, any party with network reachability and valid credentials can leverage it without additional user interaction.

Public references point to a detailed proof-of-concept on GitHub and entries on Vuldb, while the vendor site offers no specific patch or mitigation guidance in the available records. The associated EPSS score remains flat at 0.0241 with no observed increase after disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was found in TOTOLINK N300RH 6.1c.1390_B20191101. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function CloudACMunualUpdateUserdata of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. The manipulation of the argument url leads to command injection. The attack may be…

more

launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1221 Template Injection Stealth
Adversaries may create or modify references in user document templates to conceal malicious code or force authentication attempts.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1674 Input Injection Execution
Adversaries may simulate keystrokes on a victim’s computer by various means to perform any type of action on behalf of the user, such as launching the command interpreter using keyboard shortcuts, typing an inline script to be executed,…
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-4850Same product: Totolink N300Rh
CVE-2025-4851Same product: Totolink N300Rh
CVE-2026-3696Same product: Totolink N300Rh
CVE-2026-3301Same product: Totolink N300Rh
CVE-2026-1548Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2026-1326Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2026-1601Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-3987Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-5504Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-7615Same vendor: Totolink

Affected Assets

totolink
n300rh firmware
6.1c.1390_b20191101

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.

References