Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-69986 is a high-severity Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A buffer overflow vulnerability, designated CVE-2025-69986, affects the ONVIF GetStreamUri function in LSC Indoor Camera version V7.6.32. The flaw arises from the application's failure to properly validate the length of the Protocol parameter within the Transport element of a SOAP request. An oversized protocol string in a specially crafted request can trigger a stack buffer overflow, overwriting the return instruction pointer (RIP) and leading to either denial of service through device crash or remote code execution within the context of the ONVIF service. The vulnerability is associated with CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) and CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow), with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Exploitation requires network access and high privileges (PR:H), allowing a privileged attacker to send the malicious SOAP request over the network with low complexity and no user interaction. Successful exploitation can result in denial of service by crashing the device or remote code execution with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts in the ONVIF service context.
Details on the vulnerability, including the security research, are available in the advisory at https://github.com/victorGoeman/LSC-Indoor-Camera-Security-Research/blob/main/CVE-2025-69986.md. No specific patches or mitigations are detailed in the provided information.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-209095
Vulnerability Data
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the ONVIF GetStreamUri function of LSC Indoor Camera V7.6.32. The application fails to validate the length of the Protocol parameter inside the Transport element. By sending a specially crafted SOAP request containing an oversized…
more
protocol string, an attacker can overflow the stack buffer, overwriting the return instruction pointer (RIP). This vulnerability allows for Denial of Service (DoS) via device crash or Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the context of the ONVIF service.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 8 hardening rules · 4 OS baselines
—
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing input validation through analysis or test cases.
SI-10 directly requires validity checks on information inputs, structurally preventing improper or missing validation.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability to execute injected code after a stack overflow.
Requiring documented development standards and tools can embed input-validation practices into the engineering process.
Secure-engineering principles include bounds-checked coding and safe buffer handling that avoid introducing the flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require and enforce input validation during development.
Vulnerability scanning can discover stack buffer overflows but does not prevent their introduction.
Patching eliminates known instances of the weakness after discovery.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Testing against a defined set of requirements and using code review plus vulnerability scanning forces validation of inputs and handling of unanticipated conditions, reducing the chance that malformed data will be accepted.
Secure-coding guidelines and mandatory security testing (including code scans) compel developers to validate and sanitize inputs at design and implementation time, lowering the incidence of malformed or malicious data reaching downstream components.
Mandating input controls that include integrity checks and input validation ensures that untrusted data is examined before use, blocking the root cause of many injection and malformed-data weaknesses.
Security-by-design principles explicitly call for data validation and sanitization at every layer, reducing the chance that malformed or malicious input will be processed without scrutiny.
Requiring language-specific secure coding standards, peer review, SAST and documented mitigation of common programming errors forces validation of all inputs before they are trusted.
Change-management gates can enforce security reviews that catch buffer issues.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
- V-248594 OL 8 must implement address space layout randomization (ASLR) to protect its memory from unauthorized code execution. prevents CWE-121
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
- V-271452 OL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-121
RHEL 8 (1 rule)
- V-230265 RHEL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-20