Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-0634

Published
02 April 2026
Modified
03 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0052 42th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-0634 is a high-severity Argument Injection (CWE-88) vulnerability in Tecno (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-0634 is a code execution vulnerability in the AssistFeedbackService component of the TECNO Pova7 Pro 5G running Android. It stems from a command injection flaw (CWE-88) that enables local apps to execute arbitrary code with system-level privileges. The vulnerability was published on 2026-04-02 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

An attacker with local access and low privileges, such as a malicious app installed on the device, can exploit this vulnerability. Exploitation requires low complexity and no user interaction, allowing the attacker to inject commands into AssistFeedbackService and gain arbitrary code execution as the system user. This escalates privileges, potentially enabling full device compromise, data theft, or persistence mechanisms.

Mitigation details are referenced in TECNO's security updates advisory at https://security.tecno.com/SRC/securityUpdates. Security practitioners should consult this page for patch availability and deployment guidance specific to the TECNO Pova7 Pro 5G.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Code execution in AssistFeedbackService of TECNO Pova7 Pro 5G on Android allows local apps to execute arbitrary code as system via command injection.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-6437Shared CWE-88
CVE-2025-3945Shared CWE-88
CVE-2025-53509Shared CWE-88
CVE-2026-1716Shared CWE-88
CVE-2026-44790Shared CWE-88
CVE-2026-45158Shared CWE-88
CVE-2026-18157Shared CWE-88
CVE-2025-46835Shared CWE-88
CVE-2024-35307Shared CWE-88
CVE-2026-62867Shared CWE-88

Affected Assets

Tecno
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing can discover argument-injection flaws in command-construction code but does not stop their introduction.

Input validation directly stops construction of command strings containing unneutralized delimiters or injected arguments.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper input validation and command construction to prevent argument injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect argument injection but does not prevent it at the source.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent argument injection.

prevents

Application security requirements include explicit rules for safe command-line argument handling and escaping.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage unsafe command invocation patterns and favor safer APIs.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly require proper neutralization of command arguments, directly eliminating CWE-88.

References