Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-2379

Published
05 June 2026
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v4 8.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0023 13th percentile
Risk Priority 42 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-2379 is a high-severity Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release (CWE-672) vulnerability in Arista EOS (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 13th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and IA-5 (Authenticator Management) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

On affected platforms with hardware IPSec support running Arista EOS with certain IPsec features enabled, EOS may exhibit unexpected behavior in specific cases. Physical interface flaps and certain agent restarts can cause IPsec tunnel re-establishment with existing Security Associations, resulting…

more

in sequence number mismatches between tunnel endpoints potentially causing unstable communication.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-47087Shared CWE-672
CVE-2026-68481Shared CWE-672
CVE-2025-55669Shared CWE-672
CVE-2023-48220Shared CWE-672
CVE-2024-49955Shared CWE-672
CVE-2025-21117Shared CWE-672
CVE-2025-30351Shared CWE-672
CVE-2025-58149Shared CWE-672
CVE-2026-31875Shared CWE-672
CVE-2026-33463Shared CWE-672

Affected Assets

Arista
EOS
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Access enforcement applies current authorizations to every request, directly blocking operations once a resource has been revoked or released.

Authenticator management mandates revocation and replacement procedures that render expired credentials unusable.

Account lifecycle management includes explicit revocation and disabling steps that stop subsequent operations on released accounts or identifiers.

Identifier management requires deallocation and reuse controls that prevent continued use of released identifiers.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Enforcing managed authorizations and revocations directly prevents post-release operations on credentials or entitlements.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices eliminate the root coding flaw that permits use-after-release.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect use-after-release but does not prevent it at runtime.

degrades

Enforces timely deletion of resources so they cannot be used after release.

prevents

Secure-coding rules require checks that prevent operations on freed or expired objects.

prevents

Change-management processes can introduce or remove resource-lifetime controls.

References