Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-35563

Apache Directory Ldap Api 2.0.0 – 2.1.7

Published
01 June 2026
Modified
22 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0018 8th percentile
Risk Priority 31 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-35563 is a high-severity Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch (CWE-297) vulnerability in Apache Directory Ldap Api. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557); ranked at the 8th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-23 (Session Authenticity) and SC-8 (Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

It was identified that the LDAP client implementation in version 2.1.7 does not verify if the server certificate matches the intended LDAP hostname. While the underlying code validates the certificate chain against a trusted authority, the absence of endpoint identification…

more

allows a valid certificate issued for an entirely unrelated host to be improperly accepted. This oversight leaves the connection highly vulnerable to server impersonation and complete connection compromise. The root cause of this vulnerability lies in the incomplete TLS server identity verification within the LDAP client implementation. The attacker requires MITM capability on the network to exploit this vulnerability. This attacker must be able to present a certificate trusted by the client's configured trust store. The hostname verification has been enforced in the new version of the LDAP API

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
T1557.001 Name Resolution Poisoning and SMB Relay Credential Access
By responding to LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS network traffic, adversaries may spoof an authoritative source for name resolution to force communication with an adversary controlled system.
T1557.002 ARP Cache Poisoning Credential Access
Adversaries may poison Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) caches to position themselves between the communication of two or more networked devices.
T1557.003 DHCP Spoofing Credential Access
Adversaries may redirect network traffic to adversary-owned systems by spoofing Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) traffic and acting as a malicious DHCP server on the victim network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-48144Same vendor: Apache
CVE-2025-59060Same vendor: Apache
CVE-2026-48145Same vendor: Apache
CVE-2025-68637Same vendor: Apache
CVE-2023-25613Same product class: directory / identity
CVE-2025-68161Same vendor: Apache
CVE-2026-34477Same vendor: Apache
CVE-2026-43869Same vendor: Apache
CVE-2026-23904Same vendor: Apache
CVE-2026-44046Same vendor: Apache

Affected Assets

apache
directory ldap api
2.0.0 — 2.1.7

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V17.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Protecting session authenticity structurally requires proper certificate validation to bind the presented certificate to the intended host.

Requiring confidentiality and integrity of transmitted data necessitates correct TLS certificate validation with host-name checking.

Security engineering principles require correct implementation of certificate validation (including hostname matching) when cryptography is used.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.DS-02 mostly match
prevents

Protecting data-in-transit integrity depends on proper certificate validation to prevent MITM.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices include coding correct certificate validation logic.

PR.AA-03 partial match
prevents

Server/service authentication via certificates directly requires correct host validation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing certificate validation and host-mismatch checks.

degrades

Network security controls include certificate validation and host-name verification to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.

degrades

Security of network services requires proper TLS configuration and certificate validation for service endpoints.

prevents

Use of cryptography mandates correct implementation of certificate validation and hostname verification.

prevents

Application security requirements include secure communication and certificate validation for external services.

mitigates

Secure system architecture principles require proper certificate validation to protect communications.

References