Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-4408

RCE in Redhat Enterprise Linux 6.0 … 9.0

Published
28 May 2026
Modified
15 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.025 83th percentile
Risk Priority 68 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-4408 is a critical-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Redhat Enterprise Linux. Its CVSS base score is 9.0 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 17% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

A flaw exists in Samba file servers and classic domain controllers that rely on the check password script feature when configured with the %u substitution character. In such cases the client-supplied username is passed to the script without escaping shell meta-characters, enabling operating-system command injection as described by CWE-78. The issue is limited to non-standard deployments in which the check password script uses %u and the samba-dcerpcd service runs as a system service.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can supply a crafted username that results in arbitrary command execution on the affected host, corresponding to the CVSS 9.0 rating that reflects network attack vector, high impact, and changed scope.

Red Hat has published errata RHSA-2026:22644, RHSA-2026:22963, and RHSA-2026:25049 that contain the corrective updates; additional details are available in the associated CVE entry and Bugzilla report 2479762. The EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0102, indicating no material increase in observed exploitation interest since disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in Samba. A remote attacker can exploit a misconfiguration in Samba file servers and classic domain controllers that use the "check password script" feature. If this script is configured with the %u substitution character, the client-controlled…

more

username is passed without proper escaping of shell meta-characters. This vulnerability allows an attacker to achieve remote command execution on the affected system. This issue primarily affects non-standard configurations where the "check password script" is used with %u and the samba-dcerpcd service is started as a system service.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-4480Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2026-1933Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2026-2340Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2026-3012Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-0118Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2026-0980Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2024-51465Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2017-17405Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2019-5736Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2014-6271Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux

Affected Assets

redhat
openshift container platform
4.0
samba
samba
4.1.0 — 4.21.0
redhat
enterprise linux
6.0, 7.0, 9.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect command sanitization during development.

Input validation directly neutralizes or rejects special characters that would otherwise alter OS command structure.

Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.

Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.

Secure engineering principles require proper neutralization of untrusted input before command construction.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References