Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-4428

Published
19 March 2026
Modified
20 March 2026
CVSS Score v4 9.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0025 17th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-4428 is a critical-severity Improper Check for Certificate Revocation (CWE-299) vulnerability in Amazon (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 9.1 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Subvert Trust Controls (T1553); ranked at the 17th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-5 (Authenticator Management) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-4428 is a logic error in the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) distribution point validation process in AWS-LC versions prior to 1.71.0. This flaw causes partitioned CRLs to be incorrectly rejected as out of scope, allowing revoked certificates to bypass certificate revocation checks. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.4 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) and maps to CWE-299 (Improper Check for Certificate Revocation).

Remote attackers without privileges or user interaction can exploit this issue, though it requires high attack complexity. Exploitation enables the use of revoked certificates to evade revocation validation, potentially leading to high-impact confidentiality and integrity violations, such as unauthorized data access or interception in TLS connections relying on affected AWS-LC implementations.

The AWS security bulletin (2026-010-AWS) and AWS-LC release notes recommend upgrading to AWS-LC 1.71.0 or AWS-LC-FIPS-3.3.0 to remediate the vulnerability by correcting the CRL validation logic.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A logic error in CRL distribution point validation in AWS-LC before 1.71.0 causes partitioned CRLs to be incorrectly rejected as out of scope, which allows a revoked certificate to bypass certificate revocation checks. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade…

more

to AWS-LC 1.71.0 or AWS-LC-FIPS-3.3.0.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1553 Subvert Trust Controls Defense Impairment
Adversaries may undermine security controls that will either warn users of untrusted activity or prevent execution of untrusted programs.
T1553.002 Code Signing Defense Impairment
Adversaries may create, acquire, or steal code signing materials to sign their malware or tools.
T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
T1649 Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates Credential Access
Adversaries may steal or forge certificates used for authentication to access remote systems or resources.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-56821Shared CWE-299
CVE-2026-6899Shared CWE-299
CVE-2026-9636Shared CWE-299
CVE-2025-11955Shared CWE-299
CVE-2025-3085Shared CWE-299
CVE-2025-36057Shared CWE-299
CVE-2024-56138Shared CWE-299
CVE-2023-23690Shared CWE-299

Affected Assets

Amazon
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V12.1.4

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Authenticator management requires verification and lifecycle handling of certificates, which structurally prevents use of revoked ones when revocation status is part of the process.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-03 mostly match
prevents

Certificate-based authentication requires valid, non-revoked certificates; proper revocation checking is a core implementation detail of this control.

PR.DS-02 mostly match
prevents

Protecting data-in-transit commonly relies on TLS certificate validation that includes revocation status checks.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Mandates use of cryptography including certificate validation and revocation checking.

finds

Security testing can detect missing or incorrect certificate revocation checks.

prevents

Secure coding practices should include proper certificate revocation verification.

prevents

Requires secure authentication mechanisms that rely on valid certificates.

none

Network security controls can enforce certificate validation at network boundaries.

none

Security of network services includes certificate-based authentication and revocation checks.

References