CVE-2026-45296
Published: 28 May 2026
Summary
CVE-2026-45296 is a high-severity Improper Access Control (CWE-284) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 7.7 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 13.7th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-32971
Vulnerability details
OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, OpenReplay's Python API exposes several app_apikey routes that trust a caller-provided projectKey after validating only that the API key itself is valid and that the target projectKey exists. The authorization…
more
flow does not verify that the authenticated API key and the requested project belong to the same tenant. Because the public tracker design exposes projectKey to browser-side code, an attacker who owns any valid API key for their own tenant can target another tenant's project by reusing that public projectKey. The vulnerable routes allow the attacker to enumerate victim user sessions and then retrieve sensitive session event data across the tenant boundary. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Why these techniques?
Missing tenant boundary check on authenticated API routes directly enables cross-tenant data access via the exposed Python API (public-facing application exploitation).
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
The access control policy and procedures directly mandate and enforce proper access control mechanisms across the organization.
Device lock enforces restricted access until re-authentication, directly reducing unauthorized use of active sessions.
Supervision and review of access control activities directly detects and remediates improper access configurations or usages.
Explicitly identifying and documenting actions permitted without identification or authentication enforces proper access control boundaries by defining justified exceptions.
By automatically labeling outputs with security attributes, the control supports attribute-based enforcement and reduces exploitability of improper access control weaknesses.
Associating and retaining security attributes with data directly supports enforcement of access control decisions across storage, processing, and transmission.
Requiring prior authorization for each remote access type prevents improper access control over remote connections.
Requiring authorization of wireless access before allowing connections enforces proper access control for this access method.